Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Janet Incerpi

dblp:00/2188 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1987
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 78% Computational geometry · 22%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational geometry › triangulation
polygon triangulation
0.011984
Triangulation and Shape-Complexity · ACM Trans. Graph. 1984
Algorithms and data structures
runtime analysis
0.011983
Improved Upper Bounds on Shellsort · FOCS 1983
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms › sorting › in-place sorting
shellsort
0.011983
Improved Upper Bounds on Shellsort · FOCS 1983
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms
sorting
0.011983
Improved Upper Bounds on Shellsort · FOCS 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

number-theoretic analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1987 Practical Variations of Shellsort
Janet Incerpi, Robert Sedgewick
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1985 Improved Upper Bounds on Shellsort
Janet Incerpi, Robert Sedgewick
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.1
1984 Triangulation and Shape-Complexity
abstract
This paper describes a new method for triangulating a simple n-sided polygon.The algorithm runs in time O(n log s), with s _< n.The quantity s measures the sinuosity of the polygon, that is, the number of times the boundary alternates between complete spirals of opposite orientation.The value of s is in practice a very small constant, even for extremely winding polygons.Our algorithm is the first method whose performance is linear in the number of vertices, up to within a factor that depends only on the shape-complexity of the polygon.Informally, this notion of shape-complexity measures how entangled a polygon is, and is thus highly independent of the number of vertices.A practical advantage of the algorithm is that it does not require sorting or the use of any balanced tree structure.Aside from the notion of sinuosity, we are also able to characterize a large class of polygons for which the algorithm can be proven to run in O(n log log n) time.The algorithm has been implemented, tested, and empirical evidence has confirmed its theoretical claim to efficiency.
Bernard Chazelle, Janet Incerpi
ACM Trans. Graph.2
1983 Improved Upper Bounds on Shellsort
abstract
The running time of Shellsort, with the number of passes restricted to O(log N), was thought for some time to be Θ(N3/2), due to general results of Pratt. Sedgewick recently gave an O(N4/3) bound, but extensions of his method to provide better bounds seem to require new results on a classical problem in number theory. In this paper, we use a different approach to achieve O(N1+4/√2lgN).
Janet Incerpi, Robert Sedgewick
FOCS1