Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sangcheol Kim
dblp:00/4098
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 67% Medical and health informatics · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Statistical methods of translating microarray data into clinically relevant diagnostic information in colorectal cancer · Bioinform. 2005 |
Medical and health informatics › clinical diagnosis
diagnostic classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Statistical methods of translating microarray data into clinically relevant diagnostic information in colorectal cancer · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Statistical methods of translating microarray data into clinically relevant diagnostic information in colorectal cancer · Bioinform. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hypothesis testing · 0.1hotelling's t2 · 0.1ROC analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | From Words to Code: Do NLP Prompting Strategies Generalize to Code Generation?
Erin Woo, Sangyeop Yeo, Hyungkook Jun, Sangcheol Kim, Seung-won Hwang, Yu-Seung Ma |
FASE | 4 |
| 2005 | Statistical methods of translating microarray data into clinically relevant diagnostic information in colorectal cancerabstractMOTIVATION: It is a common practice in cancer microarray experiments that a normal tissue is collected from the same individual from whom the tumor tissue was taken. The indirect design is usually adopted for the experiment that uses a common reference RNA hybridized both to normal and tumor tissues. However, it is often the case that the test material is not large enough for the experimenter to extract enough RNA to conduct the microarray experiment. Hence, collecting n cases does not necessarily end up with a matched pair sample of size n. Instead we usually have a matched pair sample of size n1, and two independent samples of sizes n2 and n3, respectively, for 'reference versus normal tissue only' and 'reference versus tumor tissue only' hybridizations (n=n1 + n2 + n3). Standard statistical methods need to be modified and new statistical procedures are developed for analyzing this mixed dataset. RESULTS: We propose a new test statistic, t3, as a means of combining all the information in the mixed dataset for detecting differentially expressed (DE) genes between normal and tumor tissues. We employed the extended receiver operating characteristic approach to the mixed dataset. We devised a measure of disagreement between a RT-PCR experiment and a microarray experiment. Hotelling's T2 statistic is employed to detect a set of DE genes and its prediction rate is compared with the prediction rate of a univariate procedure. We observe that Hotelling's T2 statistic detects DE genes more efficiently than a univariate procedure and that further research is warranted on the formal test procedure using Hotelling's T2 statistic. CONTACT: [email protected]. Byung Soo Kim, Inyoung Kim, Sunho Lee 0001, Sangcheol Kim, Sun Young Rha, Hyun Cheol Chung |
Bioinform. | 4 |