Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dominic Tam

dblp:00/4123 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 50% Data integration and cleaning · 50%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › image retrieval
content-based image retrieval
0.011999
Multilevel Filtering for High-Dimensional Image Data: Why and How · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1999
Data integration and cleaning
multi-level filtering
0.011999
Multilevel Filtering for High-Dimensional Image Data: Why and How · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1999
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance prediction
query cost estimation
0.011999
Multilevel Filtering for High-Dimensional Image Data: Why and How · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimizer · 0.1cost modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Multilevel Filtering for High-Dimensional Image Data: Why and How
abstract
It has been shown that filtering is a promising way to support efficient content-based retrieval from image data. However, all existing studies on filtering restrict their attention to two levels. We consider filtering structures that have at least three levels. In the first half of the paper, by analyzing the CPU and I/O costs of various structures, we provide analytic evidence on why three-level structures can often outperform corresponding two-level ones. We provide further experimental results showing that the three-level structures are typically the best, and can beat the two-level ones by a wide margin. In the second half of the paper, we study how to find the (near-) optimal three-level structure for a given dataset. We develop an optimizer that can handle this task effectively and efficiently. Experimental results indicate that in tens of seconds of CPU time, the optimizer can find a filtering structure whose total runtime per query exceeds that of the real optimal structure by only 2-3 percent.
Raymond T. Ng, Dominic Tam
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2