Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Aline Lúcia Baroni

dblp:00/4287 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 87% Requirements engineering and software design · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
object-oriented metrics		 0.112005
Quantitative assessment of UML dynamic models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2005
Empirical software engineering
software metrics		 0.112005
Quantitative assessment of UML dynamic models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2005
Requirements engineering and software design
conceptual modeling		 0.012005
Quantitative assessment of UML dynamic models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metamodeling · 0.1UML 2.0 · 0.1OCL · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Quantitative assessment of UML dynamic models
abstract
In this work we plan to provide a suite of measures to address mainly two problem areas within contemporary object-oriented software measurement: (i) the lack of measures for the early stages of system development, like conceptual modeling and (ii) the lack of measures for dynamic models of an object-oriented system. Our suite of measures is going to be taken from UML 2.0 diagrams. OCL (Object-Constraint Language) and the UML 2.0 meta-model will be used to formalize and contextualize the definitions.
Aline Lúcia Baroni
 ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE1