EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomer M. Gil
dblp:00/4402
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Storage systems · 54% Distributed systems · 46% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 75% Network performance modeling · 25% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of things and sensor networks
distributed indexing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Scoop: An Adaptive Indexing Scheme for Stored Data in Sensor Networks · ICDE 2007 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
sensor data management |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Scoop: An Adaptive Indexing Scheme for Stored Data in Sensor Networks · ICDE 2007 |
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems › churn
churn resilience |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A performance vs. cost framework for evaluating DHT design tradeoffs under churn · INFOCOM 2005 |
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
distributed hash table |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A performance vs. cost framework for evaluating DHT design tradeoffs under churn · INFOCOM 2005 |
Storage systems › distributed storage
peer-to-peer storage |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Brief announcement: building data structures on untrusted peer-to-peer storage with per-participant logs · PODC 2003 |
Storage systems
untrusted storage |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Brief announcement: building data structures on untrusted peer-to-peer storage with per-participant logs · PODC 2003 |
Storage systems
file systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Ivy: A Read/Write Peer-to-Peer File System · OSDI 2002 |
Network security › attack resilience › attack mitigation › denial-of-service defense
denial-of-service attack detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | MULTOPS: A Data-Structure for Bandwidth Attack Detection · USENIX Security Symposium 2001 |
Distributed systems
peer-to-peer systems |
0.0 | 2 | 2005 | A performance vs. cost framework for evaluating DHT design tradeoffs under churn · INFOCOM 2005 Ivy: A Read/Write Peer-to-Peer File System · OSDI 2002 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › sensor network query processing
in-network query processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Scoop: An Adaptive Indexing Scheme for Stored Data in Sensor Networks · ICDE 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.1statistics collection · 0.1query workload adaptation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Scoop: An Adaptive Indexing Scheme for Stored Data in Sensor NetworksabstractWe present the design of Scoop, a system for indexing and querying stored data in sensor networks. Scoop works by collecting statistics about the rate of queries and distribution of sensor readings in a sensor network, and uses those statistics to build an index that tells nodes where in the network to store their data. Using this index, a queries over that stored, data can be answered, efficiently, without flooding those queries throughout the network. This approach offers a substantial advantage over other solutions that either store all data externally on a base station (requiring every reading to be collected from all nodes), or that store all data locally on the node that produced it (requiring queries to be flooded throughout the network). Our results show that Scoop offers a factor of four reduction in message transmissions relative to existing techniques in a real implementation on a 64-node mote-based sensor network. These results also show that Scoop is able to efficiently adapt to changes in the distribution of data and queries. Thomer M. Gil, Samuel Madden 0001 |
ICDE | 1 |
| 2005 | A performance vs. cost framework for evaluating DHT design tradeoffs under churnabstractProtocols for distributed hash tables (DHTs) incorporate features to achieve low latency for lookup requests in the face of churn, continuous changes in membership. These protocol features can include a directed identifier space, parallel lookups, pro-active flooding of membership changes, and stabilization protocols for maintaining accurate routing. In addition, DHT protocols have parameters that can be tuned to achieve different tradeoffs between lookup latency and communication cost due to maintenance traffic. The relative importance of the features and parameters is not well understood, because most previous work evaluates protocols on static networks. This paper presents a performance versus cost framework (PVC) that allows designers to compare the effects of different protocol features and parameter values. PVC views a protocol as consuming a certain amount of network bandwidth in order to achieve a certain lookup latency, and helps reveal the efficiency with which protocols use additional network resources to improve latency. To demonstrate the value of PVC, this paper simulates Chord, Kademlia, Kelips, OneHop, and Tapestry under different workloads and uses PVC to understand which features are more important under churn. PVC analysis shows that the key to efficiently using additional bandwidth is for a protocol to adjust its routing table size. It also shows that routing table stabilization is wasteful and can be replaced with opportunistic learning through normal lookup traffic. These insights combined demonstrate that PVC is a valuable tool for DHT designers. Jinyang Li 0001, Jeremy Stribling, Robert Morris 0005, M. Frans Kaashoek, Thomer M. Gil |
INFOCOM | 5 |
| 2003 | Brief announcement: building data structures on untrusted peer-to-peer storage with per-participant logsabstractNo abstract available. Benjie Chen, Thomer M. Gil, Athicha Muthitacharoen, Robert Morris 0005 |
PODC | 2 |
| 2002 | Ivy: A Read/Write Peer-to-Peer File System
Athicha Muthitacharoen, Robert Morris 0005, Thomer M. Gil, Benjie Chen |
OSDI | 3 |
| 2001 | MULTOPS: A Data-Structure for Bandwidth Attack Detection
Thomer M. Gil, Massimiliano Poletto |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |