Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Patrick Mauro
dblp:00/4842
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 87% Energy-efficient computing · 13% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded processor
ultra low-power architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | An Ultra Low Power System Architecture for Sensor Network Applications · ISCA 2005 |
Embedded and real-time systems › wireless communication › wireless sensor networks
wireless sensor node |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | An Ultra Low Power System Architecture for Sensor Network Applications · ISCA 2005 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor network applications |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | An Ultra Low Power System Architecture for Sensor Network Applications · ISCA 2005 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | An Ultra Low Power System Architecture for Sensor Network Applications · ISCA 2005 |
Energy-efficient computing
power management |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | An Ultra Low Power System Architecture for Sensor Network Applications · ISCA 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
full-system simulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | An Ultra Low Power System Architecture for Sensor Network ApplicationsabstractRecent years have seen a burgeoning interest in embedded wireless sensor networks with applications ranging from habitat monitoring to medical applications. Wireless sensor networks have several important attributes that require special attention to device design. These include the need for inexpensive, long-lasting, highly reliable devices coupled with very low performance requirements. Ultimately, the "holy grail" of this design space is a truly untethered device that operates off of energy scavenged from the ambient environment. In this paper, we describe an application-driven approach to the architectural design and implementation of a wireless sensor device that recognizes the event-driven nature of many sensor-network workloads. We have developed a full-system simulator for our sensor node design to verify and explore our architecture. Our simulation results suggest one to two orders of magnitude reduction in power dissipation over existing commodity-based systems for an important class of sensor network applications. We are currently in the implementation stage of design, and plan to tape out the first version of our system within the next year. Mark Hempstead, Nikhil Tripathi, Patrick Mauro, Gu-Yeon Wei, David Brooks 0001 |
ISCA | 3 |
| 2005 | Power and thermal effects of SRAM vs. Latch-Mux design styles and clock gating choicesabstractThis paper studies the impact on energy efficiency and thermal behavior of design style and clock-gating style in queue and array structures. These structures are major sources of power dissipation, and both design styles and various clock gating schemes can be found in modern, high-performance processors. Although some work in the circuits domain has explored these issues from a power perspective, thermal treatments are less common, and we are not aware of any work in the architecture domain.We study both SRAM and latch and multiplexer ("latch-mux") designs and their associated clock-gating options. Using circuit-level simulations of both design styles, we derive power-dissipation ratios which are then used in cycle-level power/performance/thermal simulations. We find that even though the "unconstrained" power of SRAM designs is always better than latch-mux designs, latch-mux designs dissipate less power in practice when a structure's average occupancy is low but access rate is high, especially when "stall gating" is used to minimize switching power. We also find that latch-mux designs with stall gating are especially promising from a thermal perspective, because they exhibit lower power density than SRAM designs. Overall, when combined with implementation and verification challenges for SRAMs, latch-mux designs with stall gating appear especially promising for designs with thermal constraints. This paper also shows the importance of considering the interaction between architectural and circuit-design choices when performing early-stage design exploration Yingmin Li, Mark Hempstead, Patrick Mauro, David Brooks 0001, Kevin Skadron |
ISLPED | 3 |