Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Joel B. Predd

dblp:00/5004 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Learning theory · 64% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 13%
Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 77% Usable security · 23%
Computer networks
2 papers
Internet of things and sensor networks · 70% Edge and fog computing · 30%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
insider threat
0.112010
Insiders behaving badly: addressing bad actors and their actions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010
Machine learning › Learning theory › loss function
bregman divergence
0.112009
Probabilistic coherence and proper scoring rules · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
collaborative learning
0.112009
A Collaborative Training Algorithm for Distributed Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.112009
A Collaborative Training Algorithm for Distributed Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Machine learning › Learning theory › loss function
proper scoring rules
0.112009
Probabilistic coherence and proper scoring rules · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
reproducing kernel hilbert space
0.112009
A Collaborative Training Algorithm for Distributed Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
communication constraints
0.112006
Consistency in models for distributed learning under communication constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.112006
Consistency in models for distributed learning under communication constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
universal consistency
0.112006
Consistency in models for distributed learning under communication constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning
0.012004
Consistency in Models for Communication Constrained Distributed Learning · COLT 2004
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network
0.022009
A Collaborative Training Algorithm for Distributed Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Consistency in models for distributed learning under communication constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
Usable security › security operations
insider threat mitigation
0.012010
Insiders behaving badly: addressing bad actors and their actions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010
Edge and fog computing
distributed learning
0.012009
A Collaborative Training Algorithm for Distributed Learning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2009
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › distributed algorithms for sensor networks
distributed classification
0.012006
Consistency in models for distributed learning under communication constraints · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2006
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Insiders behaving badly: addressing bad actors and their actions
abstract
We present a framework for describing insiders and their actions based on the organization, the environment, the system, and the individual. Using several real examples of unwelcome insider action (hard drive removal, stolen intellectual property, tax fraud, and proliferation of e-mail responses), we show how the taxonomy helps in understanding how each situation arose and could have been addressed. The differentiation among types of threats suggests how effective responses to insider threats might be shaped, what choices exist for each type of threat, and the implications of each. Future work will consider appropriate strategies to address each type of insider threat in terms of detection, prevention, mitigation, remediation, and punishment.
Shari Lawrence Pfleeger, Joel B. Predd, Jeffrey Hunker, Carla Bulford
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2
2009 A Collaborative Training Algorithm for Distributed Learning
abstract
In this paper, an algorithm is developed for collaboratively training networks of kernel-linear least-squares regression estimators. The algorithm is shown to distributively solve a relaxation of the classical centralized least-squares regression problem. A statistical analysis shows that the generalization error afforded agents by the collaborative training algorithm can be bounded in terms of the relationship between the network topology and the representational capacity of the relevant reproducing kernel Hilbert space. Numerical experiments suggest that the algorithm is effective at reducing noise. The algorithm is relevant to the problem of distributed learning in wireless sensor networks by virtue of its exploitation of local communication. Several new questions for statistical learning theory are proposed.
Joel B. Predd, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni, H. Vincent Poor
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2009 Probabilistic coherence and proper scoring rules
abstract
This paper provides self-contained proof of a theorem relating probabilistic coherence of forecasts to their non-domination by rival forecasts with respect to any proper scoring rule. The theorem recapitulates insights achieved by other investigators, and clarifies the connection of coherence and proper scoring rules to Bregman divergence.
Joel B. Predd, Robert Seiringer, Elliott H. Lieb, Daniel N. Osherson, H. Vincent Poor, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2006 Scalable Algorithms for Aggregating Disparate Forecasts of Probability
abstract
In this paper, computational aspects of the panel aggregation problem are addressed. Motivated primarily by applications of risk assessment, an algorithm is developed for fusing large corpora of internally incoherent probability assessments. The algorithm is characterized by a provable performance guarantee, and is demonstrated to be orders of magnitude faster than existing tools when tested on several real-world data-sets. In addition, unexpected connections between research in risk assessment and wireless sensor networks are exposed, as several key ideas are illustrated to be useful in both fields
Joel B. Predd, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni, H. Vincent Poor, Daniel N. Osherson
FUSION1
2006 Distributed Kernel Regression: An Algorithm for Training Collaboratively
abstract
This paper addresses the problem of distributed learning under communication constraints, motivated by distributed signal processing in wireless sensor networks and data mining with distributed databases. After formalizing a general model for distributed learning, an algorithm for collaboratively training regularized kernel least-squares regression estimators is derived. Noting that the algorithm can be viewed as an application of successive orthogonal projection algorithms, its convergence properties are investigated and the statistical behavior of the estimator is discussed in a simplified theoretical setting.
Joel B. Predd, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni, H. Vincent Poor
ITW1
2006 Consistency in models for distributed learning under communication constraints
abstract
Motivated by sensor networks and other distributed settings, several models for distributed learning are presented. The models differ from classical works in statistical pattern recognition by allocating observations of an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) sampling process among members of a network of simple learning agents. The agents are limited in their ability to communicate to a central fusion center and thus, the amount of information available for use in classification or regression is constrained. For several basic communication models in both the binary classification and regression frameworks, we question the existence of agent decision rules and fusion rules that result in a universally consistent ensemble; the answers to this question present new issues to consider with regard to universal consistency. This paper addresses the issue of whether or not the guarantees provided by Stone's theorem in centralized environments hold in distributed settings.
Joel B. Predd, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni, H. Vincent Poor
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2004 Consistency in Models for Communication Constrained Distributed Learning
Joel B. Predd, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni, H. Vincent Poor
COLT1
2004 Consistency in a model for distributed learning with specialists
abstract
Motivated by sensor networks and traditional methods of statistical pattern recognition, a model for distributed learning is formulated. The model is in line with learning models considered in the context of Stone-type classifiers, but differs in the dependency structure of the sampling process; questions of universal consistency are addressed.
Joel B. Predd, Sanjeev R. Kulkarni, H. Vincent Poor
ISIT1