Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Sigrid Goldmann

dblp:00/5215 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 64% Empirical software engineering · 28% Software maintenance and evolution · 8%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
project planning
0.012002
A Model of Planning and Enactment Support in Complex Software Development Projects · ASE 2002
Empirical software engineering
software project management
0.012002
A Model of Planning and Enactment Support in Complex Software Development Projects · ASE 2002
Requirements engineering and software design
software process
0.011999
Software Process Support over the Internet · ICSE 1999
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process modeling
0.011999
Software Process Support over the Internet · ICSE 1999
Software maintenance and evolution › software ecosystems
dependency management
0.012002
A Model of Planning and Enactment Support in Complex Software Development Projects · ASE 2002
Distributed systems
distributed coordination
0.011999
Software Process Support over the Internet · ICSE 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workflow engine · 0.0traceability · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Knowledge Management for Project Planning and Enactment in Software Engineering
Sigrid Goldmann, Harald Holz, Michael M. Richter
SEKE1
2002 A Model of Planning and Enactment Support in Complex Software Development Projects
abstract
Summary form only given. We propose an approach to facilitating not only project enactment but also project planning and monitoring, by tracking all decisions made during project planning and enactment and managing dependencies between these decisions. In order to identify those dependencies relevant for a decision, we established an extendable model of planning and plan enactment, which explicitly describes the activities likely to occur while planning and enacting a software development project, as well as standard dependencies between these activities. We formalized this model by adapting an existing dependency management system, the Redux Model of Design, to record planning and plan enactment decisions and their dependencies. Furthermore, we are currently identifying heuristics to automatically capture typical dependencies, and defining rules to provide automatic planning support where possible. This approach allows to interleave planning and plan enactment, and to feed enactment data back into the plan, either by automatically reacting to enactment events and plan changes, or by notifying the appropriate person(s). Thus, we provide extensive support for the process of planning and enacting software development projects, in the form of dependency management, user notifications, and, where possible, automation of selective process steps.
Sigrid Goldmann
ASE1
2000 Distributed Process Planning Support with MILOS
abstract
Software development processes are highly creative, and therefore prone to change frequently. Also, recent developments show that most software projects require knowledge and skills in a lot of areas. Since the necessary expertise often cannot be found at one development site, the necessity arises to distribute projects among several sites, or form "virtual" corporations, where software development is shared between several companies. The first point makes it necessary to support changes by identifying and notifying the people affected by a change. The second point emphasizes this necessity, while also complicating project planning and management: changes in one development site or company might necessitate replanning in several locations. In this paper, we introduce the MILOS approach, which provides concepts to integrate process modeling, planning, scheduling and enactment in one system. Thus dynamic plan changes, as well as automated feedback from execution to the project plan can be supported.
Sigrid Goldmann, Jürgen Münch, Harald Holz
Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng.1
1999 Software Process Support over the Internet
abstract
The MILOS system supports software development processes over the Internet.It integrates process modeling with project planning and enactment.Our flexible workflow engine allows refining and changing process models during project execution, The built-in traceability component supports change notifications and helps the project participants to ensure that the project plan as well as the state of the enactment engine reflect the "real world development process.Tool integration is accomplished by using the built-in capabilities of Web browsers.
Frank Maurer, Giancarlo Succi, Harald Holz, Boris Kötting, Sigrid Goldmann, Barbara Dellen
ICSE5