Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthieu Picantin

dblp:00/5897 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-7149-1770ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 8 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automata and formal languages
semigroup theory
0.112019
Automatic Semigroups vs Automaton Semigroups · ICALP 2019
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Automatic Semigroups vs Automaton Semigroups
abstract
We develop an effective and natural approach to interpret any semigroup admitting a special language of greedy normal forms as an automaton semigroup,namely the semigroup generated by a Mealy automaton encoding the behaviour of such a language of greedy normal forms under one-sided multiplication.The framework embraces many of the well-known classes of (automatic) semigroups: finite monoids, free semigroups, free commutative monoids, trace or divisibility monoids, braid or Artin-Tits or Krammer or Garside monoids, Baumslag-Solitar semigroups, etc.Like plactic monoids or Chinese monoids, some neither left- nor right-cancellative automatic semigroups are also investigated, as well as some residually finite variations of the bicyclic monoid. It provides what appears to be the first known connection from a class of automatic semigroupsto a class of automaton semigroups. It is worthwhile noting that, in all these cases, "being an automatic semigroup" and "being an automaton semigroup" become dual properties in a very automata-theoretical sense. Quadratic rewriting systems and associated tilings appear as a cornerstone of our construction.
Matthieu Picantin
ICALP1
2018 A New Hierarchy for Automaton Semigroups
Laurent Bartholdi, Thibault Godin, Ines Klimann, Matthieu Picantin
CIAA4
2015 A Connected 3-State Reversible Mealy Automaton Cannot Generate an Infinite Burnside Group
Ines Klimann, Matthieu Picantin, Dmytro Savchuk
DLT2
2015 On Torsion-Free Semigroups Generated by Invertible Reversible Mealy Automata
Thibault Godin, Ines Klimann, Matthieu Picantin
LATA3
2014 A Characterization of Those Automata That Structurally Generate Finite Groups
Ines Klimann, Matthieu Picantin
LATIN2
2012 Implementing Computations in Automaton (Semi)groups
Ines Klimann, Jean Mairesse, Matthieu Picantin
CIAA3
2006 Finite transducers for divisibility monoids
Matthieu Picantin
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
2005 Garside monoids vs divisibility monoids
abstract
Divisibility monoids are a natural algebraic generalisation of Mazurkiewicz trace monoids, namely monoids in which the distributivity of the underlying lattices is kept as a hypothesis, but the relations between the generators are not necessarily supposed to be commutations. Garside monoids are a natural algebraic generalisation of spherical Artin monoids, namely monoids in which the existence of common multiples is kept as a hypothesis, but the relations between the generators are not necessarily supposed to be of Coxeter type. Here, we show that the quasi-centre of these monoids can be studied and described in a similar way, and then we exhibit the intersection between the two classes of monoids.
Matthieu Picantin
Math. Struct. Comput. Sci.1