Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Weizheng Gao

dblp:00/634 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 96% Data mining · 4%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
web search
0.122007
A link-based ranking scheme for focused search · WWW 2007
Geographic ranking for a local search engine · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval › search engines › web crawling
focused crawling
0.122007
Geographically focused collaborative crawling · WWW 2006
Geographic ranking for a local search engine · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval › document retrieval › structured document retrieval
focused retrieval
0.112007
A link-based ranking scheme for focused search · WWW 2007
Information retrieval › ranking › graph-based ranking
link-based ranking
0.112007
A link-based ranking scheme for focused search · WWW 2007
Information retrieval
search engines
0.112007
Geographic ranking for a local search engine · SIGIR 2007
Information retrieval › search engines
web crawling
0.112006
Geographically focused collaborative crawling · WWW 2006
Data mining › text mining
information extraction
0.012007
Geographic ranking for a local search engine · SIGIR 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topic-sensitive pagerank · 0.1tf-idf ranking · 0.1pagerank · 0.1anchor text analysis · 0.1URL hashing · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Personalization of Content Ranking in the Context of Local Search
abstract
Ranking search results using a single ranking function for all search engine visitors is inherently bounded in the performance the ranking algorithm can achieve when considering the variety of requirements of Web searchers and the proliferation of topics and types of data modern search engines rank. Adding a geographical dimension to the mix by way of local search engines further reduces the average satisfaction a ranking algorithm can garner from local search users. Personalization has been proposed in Web search with some success but has not, to our knowledge, been investigated thoroughly in local search. As initial steps in local search personalization, we propose a model for personalizing search results in a local search engine using a hybrid of profile- and click-based user modeling methods. User profiles are used to compare local search results to the topical interests of users and the specific businesses in which they have shown interest by way of search result “clicks”. Our model is tested through a user study and is shown to result in significantly improved mean average precision over the baseline ranking system.
Philip O'Brien, Tony Abou-Assaleh, Weizheng Gao
Web Intelligence4
2007 Geographic ranking for a local search engine
abstract
Traditional ranking schemes of the relevance of a Web page to a user query in a search engine are less appropriate when the search term contains geographic information. Often, geographic entities, such as addresses, city names, and location names, appear only once or twice in a Web page, and are typically not in a heading or larger font. Consequently, an alternative ranking approach to the traditional weighted tf*idf relevance ranking is need. Further, if a Web site contains a geographic entity, it is often the case that its in- and out-neighbours do not refer to the same entity, although they may refer to other geographic entities. We present a local search engine that applies a novel ranking algorithm suitable for ranking Web pages with geographic content. We describe its major components: geographic ranking, focused crawling, geographic extractor, and the related web-sites feature.
Tony Abou-Assaleh, Weizheng Gao
SIGIR2
2007 A link-based ranking scheme for focused search
abstract
This paper introduces a novel link-based ranking algorithm based on a model of focused Web surfers. FocusedRank is described and compared to implementations of PageRank and Topic-Sensitive PageRank. We report a user study that measures the relevance and precision of each approach. FocusedRank gives superior relevancy over PageRank, while significantly reducing the computational complexity compared to the Topic-Senstivice PageRank.
Philip O'Brien, Tony Abou-Assaleh, Tapajyoti Das, Weizheng Gao, Yingbo Miao, Zhen Zhen
WWW4
2006 Geographically focused collaborative crawling
abstract
A collaborative crawler is a group of crawling nodes, in which each crawling node is responsible for a specific portion of the web. We study the problem of collecting geographi-cally-aware pages using collaborative crawling strategies. We first propose several collaborative crawling strategies for the geographically focused crawling, whose goal is to collect web pages about specified geographic locations, by considering features like URL address of page, content of page, extended anchor text of link, and others. Later, we propose various evaluation criteria to qualify the performance of such crawling strategies. Finally, we experimentally study our crawling strategies by crawling the real web data showing that some of our crawling strategies greatly outperform the simple URL-hash based partition collaborative crawling, in which the crawling assignments are determined according to the hash-value computation over URLs. More precisely, features like URL address of page and extended anchor text of link are shown to yield the best overall performance for the geographically focused crawling.
Weizheng Gao, Hyun Chul Lee, Yingbo Miao
WWW1