Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ben Goodrich
dblp:00/7566
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0009-0004-1953-0877ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Language models and text generation · 29% Question answering and dialogue systems · 19% 3D vision · 14% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
0.4 | 2 | 2019 | Generating Wikipedia by Summarizing Long Sequences · ICLR (Poster) 2018 Assessing The Factual Accuracy of Generated Text · KDD 2019 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Depth by Poking: Learning to Estimate Depth from Self-Supervised Grasping · ICRA 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
self-supervised depth estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Depth by Poking: Learning to Estimate Depth from Self-Supervised Grasping · ICRA 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue dataset |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Taskmaster-1: Toward a Realistic and Diverse Dialog Dataset · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
fact extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Assessing The Factual Accuracy of Generated Text · KDD 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Taskmaster-1: Toward a Realistic and Diverse Dialog Dataset · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Generating Wikipedia by Summarizing Long Sequences · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Imitation Learning from Visual Data with Multiple Intentions · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Depth by Poking: Learning to Estimate Depth from Self-Supervised Grasping · ICRA 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Accelerating Radius-Margin Parameter Selection for SVMs Using Geometric Bounds · ICDM 2010 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Accelerating Radius-Margin Parameter Selection for SVMs Using Geometric Bounds · ICDM 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 0.4forward kinematics · 0.4relation classification · 0.4end-to-end fact extraction · 0.4sequence-to-sequence learning · 0.3minimal enclosing ball optimization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Depth by Poking: Learning to Estimate Depth from Self-Supervised GraspingabstractAccurate depth estimation remains an open problem for robotic manipulation; even state of the art techniques including structured light and LiDAR sensors fail on reflective or transparent surfaces. We address this problem by training a neural network model to estimate depth from RGB-D images, using labels from physical interactions between a robot and its environment. Our network predicts, for each pixel in an input image, the z position that a robot's end effector would reach if it attempted to grasp or poke at the corresponding position. Given an autonomous grasping policy, our approach is self-supervised as end effector position labels can be recovered through forward kinematics, without human annotation. Although gathering such physical interaction data is expensive, it is necessary for training and routine operation of state of the art manipulation systems. Therefore, this depth estimator comes for free while collecting data for other tasks (e.g., grasping, pushing, placing). We show our approach achieves significantly lower root mean squared error than traditional structured light sensors and unsupervised deep learning methods on dif cult, industry-scale jumbled bin datasets. Ben Goodrich, Alex Kuefler, William D. Richards |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2019 | Taskmaster-1: Toward a Realistic and Diverse Dialog DatasetabstractBill Byrne, Karthik Krishnamoorthi, Chinnadhurai Sankar, Arvind Neelakantan, Ben Goodrich, Daniel Duckworth, Semih Yavuz, Amit Dubey, Kyu-Young Kim, Andy Cedilnik. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. William J. Byrne, Karthik Krishnamoorthi, Chinnadhurai Sankar, Arvind Neelakantan, Ben Goodrich, Daniel Duckworth, Semih Yavuz, Amit Dubey, Kyu-Young Kim, Andy Cedilnik |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2019 | Assessing The Factual Accuracy of Generated TextabstractWe propose a model-based metric to estimate the factual accuracy of generated text that is complementary to typical scoring schemes like ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) and BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy). We introduce and release a new large-scale dataset based on Wikipedia and Wikidata to train relation classifiers and end-to-end fact extraction models. The end-to-end models are shown to be able to extract complete sets of facts from datasets with full pages of text. We then analyse multiple models that estimate factual accuracy on a Wikipedia text summarization task, and show their efficacy compared to ROUGE and other model-free variants by conducting a human evaluation study. Ben Goodrich, Vinay Rao, Peter J. Liu, Mohammad Saleh |
KDD | 1 |
| 2018 | Generating Wikipedia by Summarizing Long Sequences
Peter J. Liu, Mohammad Saleh, Etienne Pot, Ben Goodrich, Ryan Sepassi, Lukasz Kaiser, Noam Shazeer |
ICLR (Poster) | 4 |
| 2018 | Imitation Learning from Visual Data with Multiple Intentions
Aviv Tamar, Khashayar Rohanimanesh, Yinlam Chow, Chris Vigorito, Ben Goodrich, Michael Kahane, Derik Pridmore |
ICLR (Poster) | 5 |
| 2010 | Accelerating Radius-Margin Parameter Selection for SVMs Using Geometric BoundsabstractBy considering the geometric properties of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Minimal Enclosing Ball (MEB) optimization problems, we show that upper and lower bounds on the radius-margin ratio of an SVM can be efficiently computed at any point during training. We use these bounds to accelerate radius-margin parameter selection by terminating training routines as early as possible, while still obtaining a guarantee that the parameters minimize the radius-margin ratio. Once an SVM has been partially trained on any set of parameters, we also show that these bounds can be used to evaluate and possibly reject neighboring parameter values with little or no additional training required. Empirical results show that, when selecting two parameter values, this process can reduce the number of training iterations required by a factor of 10 or more, while suffering no loss of precision in minimizing the radius-margin ratio. Ben Goodrich, David W. Albrecht, Peter E. Tischer |
ICDM | 1 |