Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Spence Green

dblp:00/9014 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 8 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Machine translation · 84% Learning theory · 8% Information extraction and text analysis · 8%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Human-AI interaction · 54% Interaction techniques and input · 36% Usability and user experience research · 11%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › computer-assisted translation
interactive machine translation
0.422016
Models and Inference for Prefix-Constrained Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2016
Predictive translation memory: a mixed-initiative system for human language translation · UIST 2014
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation
0.212016
Models and Inference for Prefix-Constrained Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
phrase-based translation
0.212016
Models and Inference for Prefix-Constrained Machine Translation · ACL (1) 2016
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.212015
Hierarchical Incremental Adaptation for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2015
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
computer-assisted translation
0.212014
Human Effort and Machine Learnability in Computer Aided Translation · EMNLP 2014
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.212013
Fast and Adaptive Online Training of Feature-Rich Translation Models · ACL (1) 2013
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › computer-assisted translation
post-editing
0.212013
The efficacy of human post-editing for language translation · CHI 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › phrase extraction
multiword expression identification
0.112011
Multiword Expression Identification with Tree Substitution Grammars: A Parsing tour de force with French · EMNLP 2011
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.012011
Multiword Expression Identification with Tree Substitution Grammars: A Parsing tour de force with French · EMNLP 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.4post-editing · 0.4machine learnability analysis · 0.4controlled experiment · 0.3n-best extraction · 0.2joint alignment and translation model · 0.2beam search · 0.2domain adaptation · 0.2visualization · 0.2statistical modeling · 0.2online training · 0.2feature-rich modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Models and Inference for Prefix-Constrained Machine Translation
abstract
We apply phrase-based and neural models to a core task in interactive machine translation: suggesting how to complete a partial translation.For the phrase-based system, we demonstrate improvements in suggestion quality using novel objective functions, learning techniques, and inference algorithms tailored to this task.Our contributions include new tunable metrics, an improved beam search strategy, an n-best extraction method that increases suggestion diversity, and a tuning procedure for a hierarchical joint model of alignment and translation.The combination of these techniques improves next-word suggestion accuracy dramatically from 28.5% to 41.2% in a large-scale English-German experiment.Our recurrent neural translation system increases accuracy yet further to 53.0%, but inference is two orders of magnitude slower.Manual error analysis shows the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches.
Jörn Wübker, Spence Green, John DeNero, Sasa Hasan, Minh-Thang Luong
ACL (1)2
2015 Hierarchical Incremental Adaptation for Statistical Machine Translation
abstract
We present an incremental adaptation approach for statistical machine translation that maintains a flexible hierarchical domain structure within a single consistent model.Both weights and rules are updated incrementally on a stream of post-edits.Our multi-level domain hierarchy allows the system to adapt simultaneously towards local context at different levels of granularity, including genres and individual documents.Our experiments show consistent improvements in translation quality from all components of our approach.
Jörn Wübker, Spence Green, John DeNero
EMNLP2
2014 Human Effort and Machine Learnability in Computer Aided Translation
abstract
Spence Green, Sida I. Wang, Jason Chuang, Jeffrey Heer, Sebastian Schuster, Christopher D. Manning. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2014.
Spence Green, Sida I. Wang, Jason Chuang, Jeffrey Heer, Sebastian Schuster 0001, Christopher D. Manning
EMNLP1
2014 Predictive translation memory: a mixed-initiative system for human language translation
abstract
The standard approach to computer-aided language translation is post-editing: a machine generates a single translation that a human translator corrects. Recent studies have shown this simple technique to be surprisingly effective, yet it underutilizes the complementary strengths of precision-oriented humans and recall-oriented machines. We present Predictive Translation Memory, an interactive, mixed-initiative system for human language translation. Translators build translations incrementally by considering machine suggestions that update according to the user's current partial translation. In a large-scale study, we find that professional translators are slightly slower in the interactive mode yet produce slightly higher quality translations despite significant prior experience with the baseline post-editing condition. Our analysis identifies significant predictors of time and quality, and also characterizes interactive aid usage. Subjects entered over 99% of characters via interactive aids, a significantly higher fraction than that shown in previous work.
Spence Green, Jason Chuang, Jeffrey Heer, Christopher D. Manning
UIST1
2013 Fast and Adaptive Online Training of Feature-Rich Translation Models
Spence Green, Sida I. Wang, Daniel M. Cer, Christopher D. Manning
ACL (1)1
2013 The efficacy of human post-editing for language translation
abstract
Language translation is slow and expensive, so various forms of machine assistance have been devised. Automatic machine translation systems process text quickly and cheaply, but with quality far below that of skilled human translators. To bridge this quality gap, the translation industry has investigated post-editing, or the manual correction of machine output. We present the first rigorous, controlled analysis of post-editing and find that post-editing leads to reduced time and, surprisingly, improved quality for three diverse language pairs (English to Arabic, French, and German). Our statistical models and visualizations of experimental data indicate that some simple predictors (like source text part of speech counts) predict translation time, and that post-editing results in very different interaction patterns. From these results we distill implications for the design of new language translation interfaces.
Spence Green, Jeffrey Heer, Christopher D. Manning
CHI1
2013 Parsing Models for Identifying Multiword Expressions
abstract
Multiword expressions lie at the syntax/semantics interface and have motivated alternative theories of syntax like Construction Grammar. Until now, however, syntactic analysis and multiword expression identification have been modeled separately in natural language processing. We develop two structured prediction models for joint parsing and multiword expression identification. The first is based on context-free grammars and the second uses tree substitution grammars, a formalism that can store larger syntactic fragments. Our experiments show that both models can identify multiword expressions with much higher accuracy than a state-of-the-art system based on word co-occurrence statistics. We experiment with Arabic and French, which both have pervasive multiword expressions. Relative to English, they also have richer morphology, which induces lexical sparsity in finite corpora. To combat this sparsity, we develop a simple factored lexical representation for the context-free parsing model. Morphological analyses are automatically transformed into rich feature tags that are scored jointly with lexical items. This technique, which we call a factored lexicon, improves both standard parsing and multiword expression identification accuracy.
Spence Green, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Christopher D. Manning
Comput. Linguistics1
2012 A Class-Based Agreement Model for Generating Accurately Inflected Translations
Spence Green, John DeNero
ACL (1)1
2012 Entity Clustering Across Languages
Spence Green, Nicholas Andrews, Matthew R. Gormley, Mark Dredze, Christopher D. Manning
HLT-NAACL1
2011 Multiword Expression Identification with Tree Substitution Grammars: A Parsing tour de force with French
Spence Green, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, John Bauer, Christopher D. Manning
EMNLP1
2010 Better Arabic Parsing: Baselines, Evaluations, and Analysis
Spence Green, Christopher D. Manning
COLING1
2010 Improved Models of Distortion Cost for Statistical Machine Translation
Spence Green, Michel Galley, Christopher D. Manning
HLT-NAACL1