EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Irit Yadin
dblp:00/951
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Concurrent programming · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Distributed computing theory · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Concurrent programming
shared memory |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Concurrent Counting (Extended Abstract) · PODC 1992 |
Distributed computing theory › concurrent objects
wait-free algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Concurrent Counting (Extended Abstract) · PODC 1992 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
wait-free algorithm · 0.0space complexity analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Concurrent Counting
Shlomo Moran, Gadi Taubenfeld, Irit Yadin |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 3 |
| 1992 | Concurrent Counting (Extended Abstract)abstractOur purpose is to implement clocks and, in general, counters in a shared memory environment. A concurrent counter is a counter that can be incremented and read, possibly at the same time by many processes. We study counters that achieve high level of concurrency and thus are likely to reduce memory contention; require only weak atomicity and thus are easy to implement; do not depend on the initial state of the memory and hence are more robust to memory changes; and are wait-free - one process cannot prevent another process from finishing its increment or read operations - and thus can tolerate any number of process failures. We concentrate on providing upper and lower bounds on the space complexity of the counters studied. Shlomo Moran, Gadi Taubenfeld, Irit Yadin |
PODC | 3 |