Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Irit Yadin

dblp:00/951 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Concurrent programming · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Concurrent programming
shared memory
0.011992
Concurrent Counting (Extended Abstract) · PODC 1992
Distributed computing theory › concurrent objects
wait-free algorithms
0.011992
Concurrent Counting (Extended Abstract) · PODC 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wait-free algorithm · 0.0space complexity analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Concurrent Counting
Shlomo Moran, Gadi Taubenfeld, Irit Yadin
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.3
1992 Concurrent Counting (Extended Abstract)
abstract
Our purpose is to implement clocks and, in general, counters in a shared memory environment. A concurrent counter is a counter that can be incremented and read, possibly at the same time by many processes. We study counters that achieve high level of concurrency and thus are likely to reduce memory contention; require only weak atomicity and thus are easy to implement; do not depend on the initial state of the memory and hence are more robust to memory changes; and are wait-free - one process cannot prevent another process from finishing its increment or read operations - and thus can tolerate any number of process failures. We concentrate on providing upper and lower bounds on the space complexity of the counters studied.
Shlomo Moran, Gadi Taubenfeld, Irit Yadin
PODC3