Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hiroyuki Hanada
dblp:01/10779
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2139-3857ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 39% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 39% Learning paradigms · 15% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 58% Machine learning and data management · 33% Spatial and temporal data management · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distributionally Robust Active Learning for Gaussian Process Regression · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distributionally Robust Active Learning for Gaussian Process Regression · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
screening rules |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Safe RuleFit: Learning Optimal Sparse Rule Model by Meta Safe Screening · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › regularization
sparse regularization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Safe RuleFit: Learning Optimal Sparse Rule Model by Meta Safe Screening · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Stat-DSM: Statistically Discriminative Sub-Trajectory Mining With Multiple Testing Correction · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2022 |
Data mining › statistical analysis
statistical inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Fast and More Powerful Selective Inference for Sparse High-Order Interaction Model · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
incremental learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Efficiently Monitoring Small Data Modification Effect for Large-Scale Learning in Changing Environment · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Fast and More Powerful Selective Inference for Sparse High-Order Interaction Model · AAAI 2022 |
Spatial and temporal data management
trajectory data |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Stat-DSM: Statistically Discriminative Sub-Trajectory Mining With Multiple Testing Correction · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
meta safe screening · 1.3group regularization · 1.3pruning · 1.1parametric programming · 1.1distributionally robust learning · 0.9tree representation · 0.6permutation-based statistical inference · 0.6large-scale learning · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Distributionally Robust Active Learning for Gaussian Process RegressionabstractGaussian process regression (GPR) or kernel ridge regression is a widely used and powerful tool for nonlinear prediction. Therefore, active learning (AL) for GPR, which actively collects data labels to achieve an accurate prediction with fewer data labels, is an important problem. However, existing AL methods do not theoretically guarantee prediction accuracy for target distribution. Furthermore, as discussed in the distributionally robust learning literature, specifying the target distribution is often difficult. Thus, this paper proposes two AL methods that effectively reduce the worst-case expected error for GPR, which is the worst-case expectation in target distribution candidates. We show an upper bound of the worst-case expected squared error, which suggests that the error will be arbitrarily small by a finite number of data labels under mild conditions. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods through synthetic and real-world datasets. Shion Takeno, Yoshito Okura, Yu Inatsu, Tatsuya Aoyama, Tomonari Tanaka, Satoshi Akahane, Hiroyuki Hanada, Noriaki Hashimoto, Taro Murayama, Hanju Lee, Shinya Kojima, Ichiro Takeuchi |
ICML | 7 |
| 2024 | Bounding Box-based Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization of Risk Measures under Input UncertaintyabstractIn this study, we propose a novel multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) method to efficiently identify the Pareto front (PF) defined by risk measures for black-box functions under the presence of input uncertainty (IU). Existing BO methods for Pareto optimization in the presence of IU are risk-specific or without theoretical guarantees, whereas our proposed method addresses general risk measures and has theoretical guarantees. The basic idea of the proposed method is to assume a Gaussian process (GP) model for the black-box function and to construct high-probability bounding boxes for the risk measures using the GP model. Furthermore, in order to reduce the uncertainty of non-dominated bounding boxes, we propose a method of selecting the next evaluation point using a maximin distance defined by the maximum value of a quasi distance based on bounding boxes. As theoretical analysis, we prove that the algorithm can return an arbitrary-accurate solution in a finite number of iterations with high probability, for various risk measures such as Bayes risk, worst-case risk, and value-at-risk. We also give a theoretical analysis that takes into account approximation errors because there exist non-negligible approximation errors (e.g., finite approximation of PFs and sampling-based approximation of bounding boxes) in practice. We confirm that the proposed method performs as well or better than existing methods not only in the setting with IU but also in the setting of ordinary MOBO through numerical experiments. Yu Inatsu, Shion Takeno, Hiroyuki Hanada, Kazuki Iwata, Ichiro Takeuchi |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2023 | Generalized Low-Rank Update: Model Parameter Bounds for Low-Rank Training Data ModificationsabstractIn this study, we have developed an incremental machine learning (ML) method that efficiently obtains the optimal model when a small number of instances or features are added or removed. This problem holds practical importance in model selection, such as cross-validation (CV) and feature selection. Among the class of ML methods known as linear estimators, there exists an efficient model update framework, the low-rank update, that can effectively handle changes in a small number of rows and columns within the data matrix. However, for ML methods beyond linear estimators, there is currently no comprehensive framework available to obtain knowledge about the updated solution within a specific computational complexity. In light of this, our study introduces a the generalized low-rank update (GLRU) method, which extends the low-rank update framework of linear estimators to ML methods formulated as a certain class of regularized empirical risk minimization, including commonly used methods such as support vector machines and logistic regression. The proposed GLRU method not only expands the range of its applicability but also provides information about the updated solutions with a computational complexity proportional to the number of data set changes. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the GLRU method, we conduct experiments showcasing its efficiency in performing cross-validation and feature selection compared to other baseline methods. Hiroyuki Hanada, Noriaki Hashimoto, Kouichi Taji, Ichiro Takeuchi |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 2023 | Safe RuleFit: Learning Optimal Sparse Rule Model by Meta Safe ScreeningabstractWe consider the problem of learning a sparse rule model, a prediction model in the form of a sparse linear combination of rules, where a rule is an indicator function defined over a hyper-rectangle in the input space. Since the number of all possible such rules is extremely large, it has been computationally intractable to select the optimal set of active rules. In this paper, to solve this difficulty for learning the optimal sparse rule model, we propose Safe RuleFit (SRF). Our basic idea is to develop meta safe screening (mSS), which is a non-trivial extension of well-known safe screening (SS) techniques. While SS is used for screening out one feature, mSS can be used for screening out multiple features by exploiting the inclusion-relations of hyper-rectangles in the input space. SRF provides a general framework for fitting sparse rule models for regression and classification, and it can be extended to handle more general sparse regularizations such as group regularization. We demonstrate the advantages of SRF through intensive numerical experiments. Hiroki Kato, Hiroyuki Hanada, Ichiro Takeuchi |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2022 | Fast and More Powerful Selective Inference for Sparse High-Order Interaction ModelabstractAutomated high-stake decision-making, such as medical diagnosis, requires models with high interpretability and reliability. We consider the sparse high-order interaction model as an interpretable and reliable model with a good prediction ability. However, finding statistically significant high-order interactions is challenging because of the intrinsically high dimensionality of the combinatorial effects. Another problem in data-driven modeling is the effect of ``cherry-picking" (i.e., selection bias). Our main contribution is extending the recently developed parametric programming approach for selective inference to high-order interaction models. An exhaustive search over the cherry tree (all possible interactions) can be daunting and impractical, even for small-sized problems. We introduced an efficient pruning strategy and demonstrated the computational efficiency and statistical power of the proposed method using both synthetic and real data. Diptesh Das, Vo Nguyen Le Duy, Hiroyuki Hanada, Koji Tsuda, Ichiro Takeuchi |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2022 | Stat-DSM: Statistically Discriminative Sub-Trajectory Mining With Multiple Testing CorrectionabstractWe propose a novelstatistical approachto evaluate thestatistical significance(reliability) of the results from discriminative sub-trajectory mining, which we callStatistically Discriminative Sub-trajectory Mining (Stat-DSM). Given two groups of trajectories, the goal of Stat-DSM is to extract moving patterns in the form of sub-trajectories that occur statistically significantly more often in one group than in the other. An advantage of the proposed method is that the statistical significance of the extracted sub-trajectories are properly controlled in the sense that the probability of finding a falsely discriminative sub-trajectory is smaller than a specified significance threshold$\alpha$(e.g., 0.05), which is crucial when the method is used in scientific or social science studies under noisy environments. Finding such statistically discriminative sub-trajectories from a massive trajectory dataset is both computationally and statistically challenging. In the Stat-DSM method, we address these difficulties by introducing a tree representation of sub-trajectories, and applying an efficient permutation-based statistical inference method to the tree. To the best of our knowledge, Stat-DSM is the first method that provides a statistical approach to quantify the reliability of discriminative sub-trajectory mining results. We illustrate the effectiveness and scalability of the Stat-DSM method by applying it to a real-world dataset containing 1,000,000 trajectories. Vo Nguyen Le Duy, Takuto Sakuma, Taiju Ishiyama, Hiroki Toda, Kazuya Arai, Masayuki Karasuyama, Yuta Okubo, Masayuki Sunaga, Hiroyuki Hanada, Yasuo Tabei, Ichiro Takeuchi |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 9 |
| 2018 | Efficiently Monitoring Small Data Modification Effect for Large-Scale Learning in Changing Environment
Hiroyuki Hanada, Atsushi Shibagaki, Jun Sakuma, Ichiro Takeuchi |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Secure Approximation Guarantee for Cryptographically Private Empirical Risk MinimizationabstractPrivacy concern has been increasingly important in many machine learning (ML) problems. We study empirical risk minimization (ERM) problems under secure multi-party computation (MPC) frameworks. Main technical tools for MPC have been developed based on cryptography. One of limitations in current cryptographically private ML is that it is computationally intractable to evaluate non-linear functions such as logarithmic functions or exponential functions. Therefore, for a class of ERM problems such as logistic regression in which non-linear function evaluations are required, one can only obtain approximate solutions. In this paper, we introduce a novel cryptographically private tool called secure approximation guarantee (SAG) method. The key property of SAG method is that, given an arbitrary approximate solution, it can provide a non-probabilistic assumption-free bound on the approximation quality under cryptographically secure computation framework. We demonstrate the benefit of the SAG method by applying it to several problems including a practical privacy-preserving data analysis task on genomic and clinical information. Toshiyuki Takada, Hiroyuki Hanada, Yoshiji Yamada, Jun Sakuma, Ichiro Takeuchi |
ACML | 2 |
| 2014 | Average-case linear-time similar substring searching by the q-gram distance
Hiroyuki Hanada, Mineichi Kudo, Atsuyoshi Nakamura |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |