This paper addresses the schedulability problem of periodic and sporadic real-time task sets with constrained deadlines preemptively scheduled on a multiprocessor platform composed by identical processors. We assume that a global work-conserving scheduler is used and migration from one processor to another is allowed during a task lifetime. First, a general method to derive schedulability conditions for multiprocessor real-time systems will be presented. The analysis will be applied to two typical scheduling algorithms: earliest deadline first (EDF) and fixed priority (FP). Then, the derived schedulability conditions will be tightened, refining the analysis with a simple and effective technique that significantly improves the percentage of accepted task sets. The effectiveness of the proposed test is shown through an extensive set of synthetic experiments.

A schedulability test is derived for the global earliest deadline zero laxity (EDZL) scheduling algorithm on a platform with multiple identical processors. The test is sufficient, but not necessary, to guarantee that a system of independent sporadic tasks with arbitrary deadlines will be successfully scheduled, with no missed deadlines, by the multiprocessor EDZL algorithm. Global EDZL is known to be at least as effective as global earliest-deadline-first (EDF) in scheduling task sets to meet deadlines. It is shown, by testing on large numbers of pseudo-randomly generated task sets, that the combination of EDZL and the new schedulability test is able to guarantee that far more task sets meet deadlines than the combination of EDF and known EDF schedulability tests.

The recent introduction of multicore system-on-a-chip architectures for embedded systems opens a new range of possibilities for both increasing the processing power and improving the fault-robustness of real-time embedded applications. Fault-tolerance and performance are often contrasting requirements. Techniques to improve robustness to hardware faults are based on replication of hardware and/or software. Conversely, techniques to improve performance are based on exploiting inherent parallelism of multiprocessor architectures. In this paper, we propose a technique that allows the user to trade-off parallelism with fault-tolerance in a multicore hardware architecture. Our technique is based on a combination of hardware mechanisms and real-time operating system mechanisms. In particular, we apply hierarchical scheduling techniques to efficiently support fault-tolerant, fault-silent and non-fault-tolerant tasks in the same system.

In the last years, a progressive migration from single processor chips to multi-core computing devices has taken place in the general-purpose and embedded system market. The development of multi-processor systems is already a core activity for the most important hardware companies. A lot of different solutions have been proposed to overcome the physical limits of single core devices and to address the increasing computational demand of modern multimedia applications. The real-time community followed this trend with an increasing number of results adapting the classical scheduling analysis to parallel computing systems. This paper will contribute to refine the schedulability analysis for symmetric multi-processor (SMP) real-time systems composed by a set of periodic and sporadic tasks. We will focus on both fixed and dynamic priority global scheduling algorithms, where tasks can migrate from one processor to another during execution. By increasing the complexity of the analysis, we will show that an improvement is possible over existing schedulability tests, significantly increasing the number of schedulable task sets detected. The added computational effort is comparable to the cost of techniques widely used in the uniprocessor case. We believe this is a reasonable cost to pay, given the intrinsically higher complexity of multi-processor devices.

This paper describes a necessary condition for feasibility of scheduling a set of sporadic hard-deadline tasks on identical multiprocessor platforms, which is also a sufficient condition if there is only a single processor. The key contribution is the characterization of the maximum, over all time intervals of a given length, of the amount of computation that must be completed to meet all deadlines, and a method of computing this function efficiently to any desired degree of accuracy. Empirical data are provided to verify that the new infeasibility test can be computed efficiently and is an improvement over previously known checks for infeasibility

Multiprocessor hardware platforms are now being considered for embedded systems, due to their high computational power and little additional cost when compared to single processor systems. When scheduling real-time applications on multiprocessor platforms, a possibility is to use global scheduling, where a scheduling algorithm dynamically assign tasks to processors, and tasks can migrate from one processor to another during their execution. In this paper, we tackle the problem of schedulability analysis of sporadic tasks in global scheduling systems, where the scheduler is the earliest deadline first (EDF) algorithm. We provide two main contributions. First, we show that two recently proposed tests perform poorly when the task set contains heavy tasks (i.e. tasks with high utilization). We also show that neither test dominates the other. As a second contribution, we introduce a new schedulability test that improves significantly the percentage of accepted task sets, especially when considering task sets containing heavy tasks. We show the effectiveness of the proposed test through an extensive set of experiments.