Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Sören J. Harner

dblp:01/1167 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
software inspection		 0.011997
A Case Study of Distributed, Asynchronous Software Inspection · ICSE 1997
Collaborative and social computing › computer-supported cooperative work
distributed collaboration		 0.011997
A Case Study of Distributed, Asynchronous Software Inspection · ICSE 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

industrial case study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 A Case Study of Distributed, Asynchronous Software Inspection
abstract
Traditional software inspection requires participants to meet together at the same time in the same place.Distributed, asynchronous inspection allows participants to conduct meetings independently of time and space, making inspection more convenient.We report on an industrial study that we have performed using a tool designed for distributed, asynchronous software inspection.Our e>..-perience suggests that distributed, asynchronous software inspection is feasible, and is a costeffective means of collaboration for geographically distributed work groups.
Michael V. Stein, John Riedl, Sören J. Harner, Vahid Mashayekhi
 ICSE3