Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mikhail J. Atalla

dblp:01/1442 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › scheduling
scheduling optimization
0.112006
Estimation of Optimal Elevator Scheduling Performance · ICRA 2006
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.012006
Estimation of Optimal Elevator Scheduling Performance · ICRA 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

upper and lower bounds · 0.1two-level minimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Estimation of Optimal Elevator Scheduling Performance
abstract
Group elevator scheduling is important for transportation efficiency in mid-rise and high-rise buildings, and incessant efforts have been made to improve the service efficiency of elevators. Although these efforts have achieved performance improvements, the performance limit remains an open issue. This paper tries to address that goal by estimating the optimal performance of group elevator scheduling with complete knowledge of future traffic information. A two-level minimization formulation is presented, with passenger-to-car at the high level, and single car dispatching at the low level. The low level is formulated as a passenger-to-trip assignment problem by using a concept trip to facilitate the description of single car dispatching strategies. In view of the difficulty to obtain the absolute optimal performance, our goal turns into its upper and lower bounds. The upper bound is obtained by finding a good feasible solution to this problem. The lower bound is obtained by finding the lower bound for a newly constructed problem whose optimal performance is less than or equal to that of the original problem. Numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness and the scalability of our method
Jin Sun 0008, Qianchuan Zhao, Peter B. Luh, Mikhail J. Atalla
ICRA4