Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jitka Crhová

dblp:01/2026 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
distributed model checking
0.012002
Distributed Modular Model Checking · ASE 2002
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
state space explosion
0.012002
Distributed Modular Model Checking · ASE 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal logic · 0.0modular verification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Distributed Modular Model Checking
abstract
Summary form only given. Model checking is a formal method that verifies whether a finite state model of a system satisfies a specification given as a temporal logic formula. The most severe problem model checking suffers from is the so called state explosion problem. Distribution is one of the techniques that combat the state explosion. The aim is to distribute the state space among a number of computers so as to be able to verify larger systems. Another approach that deals with the state explosion problem is modularity, i.e. exploiting the structure of the system. We propose to employ modular techniques to the distributed model checking problem. This can be useful especially for software, as the software model checking algorithms suffer from state explosion more severely than the hardware model checking techniques even when the system consists of one sequential finite-state component. Moreover, software programs have typically richer syntactic structure that can be exploited. Besides elaborating a theoretical background for distributed model checking based on the modular approach, we also intend to develop modular approaches to partitioning the state space, in particular to define partition functions that reduce the necessary communication in the distributed environment.
Jitka Crhová
ASE1