Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rafael Santschi
dblp:01/2906
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Integrated circuit design · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design
low-power circuit design |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Low-power architectural trade-offs in a VLSI implementation of an adaptive hearing aid algorithm · DAC 2006 |
Integrated circuit design
VLSI design |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Low-power architectural trade-offs in a VLSI implementation of an adaptive hearing aid algorithm · DAC 2006 |
Audio and music processing › hearing aids
hearing aid signal processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Low-power architectural trade-offs in a VLSI implementation of an adaptive hearing aid algorithm · DAC 2006 |
Audio and music processing
speech enhancement |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Low-power architectural trade-offs in a VLSI implementation of an adaptive hearing aid algorithm · DAC 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
resource sharing · 0.1gate-level simulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Low-power architectural trade-offs in a VLSI implementation of an adaptive hearing aid algorithmabstractThis paper analyzes the power-area trade-off of functionally equivalent architectural implementations of a speech enhancement algorithm for hearing aids. Gate-level simulations and measurements show that an optimum degree of resource sharing (0.60 mW in a 0.25 /spl mu/m CMOS process) is more energy-efficient than both the fully time-multiplexed (1.42 mW) and the isomorphic architecture (1.54 mW), without overly large area overhead (0.77 mm/sup 2/ against 0.43 mm/sup 2/ and 4.31 mm/sup 2/, respectively). Felix Bürgin, Flavio Carbognani, Martin Hediger, Hektor Meier, Robert Meyer-Piening, Rafael Santschi, Hubert Kaeslin, Norbert Felber, Wolfgang Fichtner |
DAC | 6 |