Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiaojing Zheng

dblp:01/3095 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 62% Computational science and engineering · 38%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.412019
Multi-SNP mediation intersection-union test · Bioinform. 2019
Computational science and engineering
mediation analysis
0.412019
Multi-SNP mediation intersection-union test · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
clustering validation
0.112006
Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene clustering
0.112006
Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.112006
Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
model-based clustering
0.112006
Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

intersection-union test · 0.4weighted rand index · 0.1tight clustering · 0.1k-means · 0.1hierarchical clustering · 0.1SOM · 0.1PAM · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Robust Adaptive Fixed-Time Consensus for Nonlinear High-Order Multi-Agent Systems
abstract
This paper investigates the consensus problem of leader-follower nonlinear high-order multi-agent systems through a fully distributed approach. A distributed consensus tracking control scheme is proposed, embedding a fixed-time convergent command filter with adaptive gain to ensure that the filter error ultimately reaches the origin. To tackle the challenges posed by unknown bounds of system nonlinearities and external disturbances, a robust control protocol is developed, incorporating an adaptive mechanism to implement compensatory action instead of directly estimating the lumped uncertainty. A notable feature of the proposed approach lies in its capability to determine the settling time bound without any global information, including the number of nodes, the eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix, and other unknown parameters. The efficacy of the developed methodology is validated through numerical simulations and physical experiment conducted on a multi-motor system.
Guofei Li 0001, Zongyu Zuo, Xiaojing Zheng
IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng.5
2023 Validity Analysis of Network Big Data
abstract
False data in network big data has led to considerable ineffectiveness in perceiving the property of fact. Correct conclusions can be drawn only by accurately identifying and eliminating these false data. In other words, analysis is the premise to reaching a correct conclusion. This paper develops a big data network dissemination model based on the properties of the network. We also analyze the attributes of the big data random complex network based on the revised F-J model. Then, based on the scale-free nature of network big data, the evolution law of connected giant components and Bayesian inference, we propose an identification method of effective data in networks. Finally, after obtaining the real data, we analyze the dissemination and evolution characteristics of the network big data. The results show that if some online users intentionally spread false data on a large-scale website, the entire network data becomes false, despite a minimal probability of choosing these dissemination sources.
Huaxia Lv, Xiaojing Zheng, Wenhui Ma, Weijin Wang
J. Web Eng.3
2021 Exploring resource management for innovation power network based on deep learning algorithm
Congmin Liu, Xiaojing Zheng
Neural Comput. Appl.2
2019 Multi-SNP mediation intersection-union test
abstract
SUMMARY: Tens of thousands of reproducibly identified GWAS (Genome-Wide Association Studies) variants, with the vast majority falling in non-coding regions resulting in no eventual protein products, call urgently for mechanistic interpretations. Although numerous methods exist, there are few, if any methods, for simultaneously testing the mediation effects of multiple correlated SNPs via some mediator (e.g. the expression of a gene in the neighborhood) on phenotypic outcome. We propose multi-SNP mediation intersection-union test (SMUT) to fill in this methodological gap. Our extensive simulations demonstrate the validity of SMUT as well as substantial, up to 92%, power gains over alternative methods. In addition, SMUT confirmed known mediators in a real dataset of Finns for plasma adiponectin level, which were missed by many alternative methods. We believe SMUT will become a useful tool to generate mechanistic hypotheses underlying GWAS variants, facilitating functional follow-up. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The R package SMUT is publicly available from CRAN at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SMUT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Wujuan Zhong, Cassandra N. Spracklen, Karen L. Mohlke, Xiaojing Zheng, Jason Fine
Bioinform.4
2006 Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis
abstract
MOTIVATION: Microarray technology has been widely applied in biological and clinical studies for simultaneous monitoring of gene expression in thousands of genes. Gene clustering analysis is found useful for discovering groups of correlated genes potentially co-regulated or associated to the disease or conditions under investigation. Many clustering methods including hierarchical clustering, K-means, PAM, SOM, mixture model-based clustering and tight clustering have been widely used in the literature. Yet no comprehensive comparative study has been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods. RESULTS: In this paper, six gene clustering methods are evaluated by simulated data from a hierarchical log-normal model with various degrees of perturbation as well as four real datasets. A weighted Rand index is proposed for measuring similarity of two clustering results with possible scattered genes (i.e. a set of noise genes not being clustered). Performance of the methods in the real data is assessed by a predictive accuracy analysis through verified gene annotations. Our results show that tight clustering and model-based clustering consistently outperform other clustering methods both in simulated and real data while hierarchical clustering and SOM perform among the worst. Our analysis provides deep insight to the complicated gene clustering problem of expression profile and serves as a practical guideline for routine microarray cluster analysis.
Anbupalam Thalamuthu, Indranil Mukhopadhyay, Xiaojing Zheng, George C. Tseng
Bioinform.3