Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kanela Kaligosi

dblp:01/3245 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 50% Computational complexity · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
query complexity
0.112005
Towards Optimal Multiple Selection · ICALP 2005
Algorithms and data structures › selection
selection algorithms
0.112005
Towards Optimal Multiple Selection · ICALP 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound · 0.1comparison model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Cycle bases of graphs and sampled manifolds
Craig Gotsman, Kanela Kaligosi, Kurt Mehlhorn, Dimitrios Michail 0001, Evangelia Pyrga
Comput. Aided Geom. Des.2
2006 Faster Algorithms for Computing Longest Common Increasing Subsequences
abstract
We present algorithms for finding a longest common increasing subsequence of two or more input sequences. For two sequences of lengths m and n, where m≥n, we present an algorithm with an output-dependent expected running time of $O((m+n\ell) \log\log \sigma + {\ensuremath{\mathit{Sort}}})$ and O(m) space, where ℓ is the length of an LCIS, σ is the size of the alphabet, and ${\ensuremath{\mathit{Sort}}}$ is the time to sort each input sequence. For k≥3 length-n sequences we present an algorithm which improves the previous best bound by more than a factor k for many inputs. In both cases, our algorithms are conceptually quite simple but rely on existing sophisticated data structures. Finally, we introduce the problem of longest common weakly-increasing (or non-decreasing) subsequences (LCWIS), for which we present an O(m+nlogn)-time algorithm for the 3-letter alphabet case. For the extensively studied longest common subsequence problem, comparable speedups have not been achieved for small alphabets.
Gerth Stølting Brodal, Kanela Kaligosi, Irit Katriel, Martin Kutz
CPM2
2006 How Branch Mispredictions Affect Quicksort
Kanela Kaligosi, Peter Sanders 0001
ESA1
2005 Towards Optimal Multiple Selection
Kanela Kaligosi, Kurt Mehlhorn, J. Ian Munro, Peter Sanders 0001
ICALP1