EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mario Marchand
dblp:01/4590
· DBLP profile ↗
45ranked-venue papers
8as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-7078-7393ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 42 · 8 first-author · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
32 papers |
Learning theory · 34% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 69% Algorithms and data structures · 31% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 67, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
1.8 | 7 | 2023 | On the Stability-Plasticity Dilemma in Continual Meta-Learning: Theory and Algorithm · NeurIPS 2023 Generalization Bounds For Meta-Learning: An Information-Theoretic Analysis · NeurIPS 2021 Decision trees as partitioning machines to characterize their generalization properties · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Partial Order in Chaos: Consensus on Feature Attributions in the Rashomon Set · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Fooling SHAP with Stealthily Biased Sampling · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | On the Stability-Plasticity Dilemma in Continual Meta-Learning: Theory and Algorithm · NeurIPS 2023 Generalization Bounds For Meta-Learning: An Information-Theoretic Analysis · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds |
0.7 | 8 | 2011 | From PAC-Bayes Bounds to Quadratic Programs for Majority Votes · ICML 2011 A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods · ICML 2011 From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Stability-Plasticity Dilemma in Continual Meta-Learning: Theory and Algorithm · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
continual meta-learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Stability-Plasticity Dilemma in Continual Meta-Learning: Theory and Algorithm · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
excess risk |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Stability-Plasticity Dilemma in Continual Meta-Learning: Theory and Algorithm · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Partial Order in Chaos: Consensus on Feature Attributions in the Rashomon Set · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
rashomon set |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Partial Order in Chaos: Consensus on Feature Attributions in the Rashomon Set · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › shapley value
SHAP |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fooling SHAP with Stealthily Biased Sampling · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
stability-plasticity trade-off |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Stability-Plasticity Dilemma in Continual Meta-Learning: Theory and Algorithm · NeurIPS 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fooling SHAP with Stealthily Biased Sampling · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
information-theoretic generalization bounds |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generalization Bounds For Meta-Learning: An Information-Theoretic Analysis · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning › gradient-based meta-learning
model-agnostic meta-learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Generalization Bounds For Meta-Learning: An Information-Theoretic Analysis · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › VC theory
VC dimension |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Decision trees as partitioning machines to characterize their generalization properties · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | Algorithms for the Hard Pre-Image Problem of String Kernels and the General Problem of String Prediction · ICML 2015 A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods · ICML 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC-Bayesian analysis |
0.3 | 3 | 2015 | Risk bounds for the majority vote: from a PAC-Bayesian analysis to a learning algorithm · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 A PAC-Bayes approach to the Set Covering Machine · NIPS 2005 PAC-Bayes Learning of Conjunctions and Classification of Gene-Expression Data · NIPS 2004 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.3 | 4 | 2014 | Agnostic Bayesian Learning of Ensembles · ICML 2014 From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL Regularization · NIPS 2009 PAC-Bayes Risk Bounds for Stochastic Averages and Majority Votes of Sample-Compressed Classifiers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › distribution adaptation
adversarial domain adaptation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain-invariant representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
risk bounds |
0.2 | 2 | 2013 | Risk Bounds and Learning Algorithms for the Regression Approach to Structured Output Prediction · ICML (1) 2013 A PAC-Bayes approach to the Set Covering Machine · NIPS 2005 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
majority voting |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Risk bounds for the majority vote: from a PAC-Bayesian analysis to a learning algorithm · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2015 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › structured kernel
string kernel |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Algorithms for the Hard Pre-Image Problem of String Kernels and the General Problem of String Prediction · ICML 2015 |
Algorithms and data structures › sequence algorithms
string algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Algorithms for the Hard Pre-Image Problem of String Kernels and the General Problem of String Prediction · ICML 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
sample compression |
0.2 | 3 | 2007 | PAC-Bayes Risk Bounds for Stochastic Averages and Majority Votes of Sample-Compressed Classifiers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007 Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007 PAC-Bayes risk bounds for sample-compressed Gibbs classifiers · ICML 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian prediction
bayesian ensemble methods |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Agnostic Bayesian Learning of Ensembles · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian model selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Agnostic Bayesian Learning of Ensembles · ICML 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
max-margin markov networks |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Multilabel Structured Output Learning with Random Spanning Trees of Max-Margin Markov Networks · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
structured output learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Multilabel Structured Output Learning with Random Spanning Trees of Max-Margin Markov Networks · NIPS 2014 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Risk Bounds and Learning Algorithms for the Regression Approach to Structured Output Prediction · ICML (1) 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
biased sampling · 1.3SHAP · 1.3random forest · 0.7meta-learning · 0.7kernel ridge regression · 0.7bi-level optimization · 0.7additive model · 0.7information theory · 0.5PAC-Bayes analysis · 0.5partitioning function · 0.4upper bound on prediction function · 0.2normalized kernel · 0.2branch-and-bound search · 0.2quadratic regression loss · 0.2prediction risk bound · 0.2output kernel · 0.2sample compression · 0.1occam's razor · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Tackling the XAI Disagreement Problem with Regional ExplanationsabstractThe XAI Disagreement Problem concerns the fact that various explainability methods yield different local/global insights on model behavior. Thus, given the lack of ground truth in explainability, practitioners are left wondering “Which explanation should I believe?”. In this work, we approach the Disagreement Problem from the point of view of Functional Decomposition (FD). First, we demonstrate that many XAI techniques disagree because they handle feature interactions differently. Secondly, we reduce interactions locally by fitting a so-called FD-Tree, which partitions the input space into regions where the model is approximately additive. Thus instead of providing global explanations aggregated over the whole dataset, we advocate reporting the FD-Tree structure as well as the regional explanations extracted from its leaves. The beneficial effects of FD-Trees on the Disagreement Problem are demonstrated on toy and real datasets. Gabriel Laberge, Yann Pequignot, Mario Marchand, Foutse Khomh |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2023 | Algorithm-Dependent Bounds for Representation Learning of Multi-Source Domain AdaptationabstractWe use information-theoretic tools to derive a novel analysis of Multi-source Domain Adaptation (MDA) from the representation learning perspective. Concretely, we study joint distribution alignment for supervised MDA with few target labels and unsupervised MDA with pseudo labels, where the latter is relatively hard and less commonly studied. We further provide algorithm-dependent generalization bounds for these two settings, where the generalization is characterized by the mutual information between the parameters and the data. Then we propose a novel deep MDA algorithm, implicitly addressing the target shift through joint alignment. Finally, the mutual information bounds are extended to this algorithm providing a non-vacuous gradient-norm estimation. The proposed algorithm has comparable performance to the state-of-the-art on target-shifted MDA benchmark with improved memory efficiency. Qi Chen 0015, Mario Marchand |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2023 | Fooling SHAP with Stealthily Biased Sampling
Gabriel Laberge, Ulrich Aïvodji, Satoshi Hara 0001, Mario Marchand, Foutse Khomh |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2023 | On the Stability-Plasticity Dilemma in Continual Meta-Learning: Theory and AlgorithmabstractWe focus on Continual Meta-Learning (CML), which targets accumulating and exploiting meta-knowledge on a sequence of non-i.i.d. tasks. The primary challenge is to strike a balance between stability and plasticity, where a model should be stable to avoid catastrophic forgetting in previous tasks and plastic to learn generalizable concepts from new tasks. To address this, we formulate the CML objective as controlling the average excess risk upper bound of the task sequence, which reflects the trade-off between forgetting and generalization. Based on the objective, we introduce a unified theoretical framework for CML in both static and shifting environments, providing guarantees for various task-specific learning algorithms. Moreover, we first present a rigorous analysis of a bi-level trade-off in shifting environments. To approach the optimal trade-off, we propose a novel algorithm that dynamically adjusts the meta-parameter and its learning rate w.r.t environment change. Empirical evaluations on synthetic and real datasets illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed theory and algorithm. Qi Chen 0015, Changjian Shui, Ligong Han, Mario Marchand |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | Partial Order in Chaos: Consensus on Feature Attributions in the Rashomon SetabstractPost-hoc global/local feature attribution methods are progressively being employed to understand the decisions of complex machine learning models. Yet, because of limited amounts of data, it is possible to obtain a diversity of models with good empirical performance but that provide very different explanations for the same prediction, making it hard to derive insight from them. In this work, instead of aiming at reducing the under-specification of model explanations, we fully embrace it and extract logical statements about feature attributions that are consistent across all models with good empirical performance (i.e. all models in the Rashomon Set). We show that partial orders of local/global feature importance arise from this methodology enabling more nuanced interpretations by allowing pairs of features to be incomparable when there is no consensus on their relative importance. We prove that every relation among features present in these partial orders also holds in the rankings provided by existing approaches. Finally, we present three use cases employing hypothesis spaces with tractable Rashomon Sets (Additive models, Kernel Ridge, and Random Forests) and show that partial orders allow one to extract consistent local and global interpretations of models despite their under-specification. Gabriel Laberge, Yann Pequignot, Alexandre Mathieu, Foutse Khomh, Mario Marchand |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 5 |
| 2021 | Generalization Bounds For Meta-Learning: An Information-Theoretic AnalysisabstractWe derive a novel information-theoretic analysis of the generalization property of meta-learning algorithms. Concretely, our analysis proposes a generic understanding in both the conventional learning-to-learn framework \citep{amit2018meta} and the modern model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) algorithms \citep{finn2017model}.Moreover, we provide a data-dependent generalization bound for the stochastic variant of MAML, which is \emph{non-vacuous} for deep few-shot learning. As compared to previous bounds that depend on the square norms of gradients, empirical validations on both simulated data and a well-known few-shot benchmark show that our bound is orders of magnitude tighter in most conditions. Qi Chen 0015, Changjian Shui, Mario Marchand |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Decision trees as partitioning machines to characterize their generalization propertiesabstractDecision trees are popular machine learning models that are simple to build and easy to interpret. Even though algorithms to learn decision trees date back to almost 50 years, key properties affecting their generalization error are still weakly bounded. Hence, we revisit binary decision trees on real-valued features from the perspective of partitions of the data. We introduce the notion of partitioning function, and we relate it to the growth function and to the VC dimension. Using this new concept, we are able to find the exact VC dimension of decision stumps, which is given by the largest integer $d$ such that $2\ell \ge \binom{d}{\floor{\frac{d}{2}}}$, where $\ell$ is the number of real-valued features. We provide a recursive expression to bound the partitioning functions, resulting in a upper bound on the growth function of any decision tree structure. This allows us to show that the VC dimension of a binary tree structure with $N$ internal nodes is of order $N \log(N\ell)$. Finally, we elaborate a pruning algorithm based on these results that performs better than the CART algorithm on a number of datasets, with the advantage that no cross-validation is required. Jean-Samuel Leboeuf, Frédéric Leblanc, Mario Marchand |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2016 | A Column Generation Bound Minimization Approach with PAC-Bayesian Generalization GuaranteesabstractThe C-bound, introduced in Lacasse et al (2006), gives a tight upper bound on the risk of the majority vote classifier. Laviolette et al. (2011) designed a learning algorithm named MinCq that outputs a dense distribution on a finite set of base classifiers by minimizing the C-bound, together with a PAC-Bayesian generalization guarantee. In this work, we design a column generation algorithm that we call CqBoost, that optimizes the C-bound and outputs a sparse distribution on a possibly infinite set of voters. We also propose a PAC-Bayesian bound for CqBoost that holds for finite and two cases of continuous sets of base classifiers. Finally, compare the accuracy and the sparsity of CqBoost with MinCq and other state-of-the-art boosting algorithms. Jean-Francis Roy, Mario Marchand, François Laviolette |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2016 | Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural NetworksabstractWe introduce a new representation learning approach for domain adaptation, in which data at training and test time come from similar but different distributions. Our approach is directly inspired by the theory on domain adaptation suggesting that, for effective domain transfer to be achieved, predictions must be made based on features that cannot discriminate between the training (source) and test (target) domains. The approach implements this idea in the context of neural network architectures that are trained on labeled data from the source domain and unlabeled data from the target domain (no labeled target-domain data is necessary). As the training progresses, the approach promotes the emergence of features that are (i) discriminative for the main learning task on the source domain and (ii) indiscriminate with respect to the shift between the domains. We show that this adaptation behaviour can be achieved in almost any feed-forward model by augmenting it with few standard layers and a new gradient reversal layer. The resulting augmented architecture can be trained using standard backpropagation and stochastic gradient descent, and can thus be implemented with little effort using any of the deep learning packages. We demonstrate the success of our approach for two distinct classification problems (document sentiment analysis and image classification), where state-of-the-art domain adaptation performance on standard benchmarks is achieved. We also validate the approach for descriptor learning task in the context of person re-identification application. Yaroslav Ganin, Evgeniya Ustinova, Hana Ajakan, Pascal Germain, Hugo Larochelle, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Victor S. Lempitsky |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 7 |
| 2015 | Algorithms for the Hard Pre-Image Problem of String Kernels and the General Problem of String PredictionabstractWe address the pre-image problem encountered in structured output prediction and the one of finding a string maximizing the prediction function of various kernel-based classifiers and regressors. We demonstrate that these problems reduce to a common combinatorial problem valid for many string kernels. For this problem, we propose an upper bound on the prediction function which has low computational complexity and which can be used in a branch and bound search algorithm to obtain optimal solutions. We also show that for many string kernels, the complexity of the problem increases significantly when the kernel is normalized. On the optical word recognition task, the exact solution of the pre-image problem is shown to significantly improve the prediction accuracy in comparison with an approximation found by the best known heuristic. On the task of finding a string maximizing the prediction function of kernel-based classifiers and regressors, we highlight that existing methods can be biased toward long strings that contain many repeated symbols. We demonstrate that this bias is removed when using normalized kernels. Finally, we present results for the discovery of lead compounds in drug discovery. The source code can be found at https://github.com/a-ro/preimage Sébastien Giguère, Amélie Rolland, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand |
ICML | 4 |
| 2015 | Risk bounds for the majority vote: from a PAC-Bayesian analysis to a learning algorithm
Pascal Germain, Alexandre Lacasse, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Jean-Francis Roy |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2015 | Machine Learning Assisted Design of Highly Active Peptides for Drug DiscoveryabstractThe discovery of peptides possessing high biological activity is very challenging due to the enormous diversity for which only a minority have the desired properties. To lower cost and reduce the time to obtain promising peptides, machine learning approaches can greatly assist in the process and even partly replace expensive laboratory experiments by learning a predictor with existing data or with a smaller amount of data generation. Unfortunately, once the model is learned, selecting peptides having the greatest predicted bioactivity often requires a prohibitive amount of computational time. For this combinatorial problem, heuristics and stochastic optimization methods are not guaranteed to find adequate solutions. We focused on recent advances in kernel methods and machine learning to learn a predictive model with proven success. For this type of model, we propose an efficient algorithm based on graph theory, that is guaranteed to find the peptides for which the model predicts maximal bioactivity. We also present a second algorithm capable of sorting the peptides of maximal bioactivity. Extensive analyses demonstrate how these algorithms can be part of an iterative combinatorial chemistry procedure to speed up the discovery and the validation of peptide leads. Moreover, the proposed approach does not require the use of known ligands for the target protein since it can leverage recent multi-target machine learning predictors where ligands for similar targets can serve as initial training data. Finally, we validated the proposed approach in vitro with the discovery of new cationic antimicrobial peptides. Source code freely available at http://graal.ift.ulaval.ca/peptide-design/. Sébastien Giguère, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Denise M. Tremblay, Sylvain Moineau, Xinxia Liang, Éric Biron, Jacques Corbeil |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 3 |
| 2014 | Agnostic Bayesian Learning of EnsemblesabstractWe propose a method for producing ensembles of predictors based on holdout estimations of their generalization performances. This approach uses a prior directly on the performance of predictors taken from a finite set of candidates and attempts to infer which one is best. Using Bayesian inference, we can thus obtain a posterior that represents our uncertainty about that choice and construct a weighted ensemble of predictors accordingly. This approach has the advantage of not requiring that the predictors be probabilistic themselves, can deal with arbitrary measures of performance and does not assume that the data was actually generated from any of the predictors in the ensemble. Since the problem of finding the best (as opposed to the true) predictor among a class is known as agnostic PAC-learning, we refer to our method as agnostic Bayesian learning. We also propose a method to address the case where the performance estimate is obtained from k-fold cross validation. While being efficient and easily adjustable to any loss function, our experiments confirm that the agnostic Bayes approach is state of the art compared to common baselines such as model selection based on k-fold cross-validation or a linear combination of predictor outputs. Alexandre Lacoste, Mario Marchand, François Laviolette, Hugo Larochelle |
ICML | 2 |
| 2014 | Multilabel Structured Output Learning with Random Spanning Trees of Max-Margin Markov Networks
Mario Marchand, Hongyu Su, Emilie Morvant, Juho Rousu, John Shawe-Taylor |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2014 | Sequential Model-Based Ensemble Optimization
Alexandre Lacoste, Hugo Larochelle, Mario Marchand, François Laviolette |
UAI | 3 |
| 2013 | Risk Bounds and Learning Algorithms for the Regression Approach to Structured Output PredictionabstractWe provide rigorous guarantees for the regression approach to structured output prediction. We show that the quadratic regression loss is a convex surrogate of the prediction loss when the output kernel satisfies some condition with respect to the prediction loss. We provide two upper bounds of the prediction risk that depend on the empirical quadratic risk of the predictor. The minimizer of the first bound is the predictor proposed by Cortes et al. (2007) while the minimizer of the second bound is a predictor that has never been proposed so far. Both predictors are compared on practical tasks. Sébastien Giguère, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Khadidja Sylla |
ICML (1) | 3 |
| 2013 | Learning a peptide-protein binding affinity predictor with kernel ridge regressionabstractBACKGROUND: The cellular function of a vast majority of proteins is performed through physical interactions with other biomolecules, which, most of the time, are other proteins. Peptides represent templates of choice for mimicking a secondary structure in order to modulate protein-protein interaction. They are thus an interesting class of therapeutics since they also display strong activity, high selectivity, low toxicity and few drug-drug interactions. Furthermore, predicting peptides that would bind to a specific MHC alleles would be of tremendous benefit to improve vaccine based therapy and possibly generate antibodies with greater affinity. Modern computational methods have the potential to accelerate and lower the cost of drug and vaccine discovery by selecting potential compounds for testing in silico prior to biological validation. RESULTS: We propose a specialized string kernel for small bio-molecules, peptides and pseudo-sequences of binding interfaces. The kernel incorporates physico-chemical properties of amino acids and elegantly generalizes eight kernels, comprised of the Oligo, the Weighted Degree, the Blended Spectrum, and the Radial Basis Function. We provide a low complexity dynamic programming algorithm for the exact computation of the kernel and a linear time algorithm for it's approximation. Combined with kernel ridge regression and SupCK, a novel binding pocket kernel, the proposed kernel yields biologically relevant and good prediction accuracy on the PepX database. For the first time, a machine learning predictor is capable of predicting the binding affinity of any peptide to any protein with reasonable accuracy. The method was also applied to both single-target and pan-specific Major Histocompatibility Complex class II benchmark datasets and three Quantitative Structure Affinity Model benchmark datasets. CONCLUSION: On all benchmarks, our method significantly (p-value ≤ 0.057) outperforms the current state-of-the-art methods at predicting peptide-protein binding affinities. The proposed approach is flexible and can be applied to predict any quantitative biological activity. Moreover, generating reliable peptide-protein binding affinities will also improve system biology modelling of interaction pathways. Lastly, the method should be of value to a large segment of the research community with the potential to accelerate the discovery of peptide-based drugs and facilitate vaccine development. The proposed kernel is freely available at http://graal.ift.ulaval.ca/downloads/gs-kernel/. Sébastien Giguère, Mario Marchand, François Laviolette, Alexandre Drouin, Jacques Corbeil |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2012 | Feature Selection with Conjunctions of Decision Stumps and Learning from Microarray DataabstractOne of the objectives of designing feature selection learning algorithms is to obtain classifiers that depend on a small number of attributes and have verifiable future performance guarantees. There are few, if any, approaches that successfully address the two goals simultaneously. To the best of our knowledge, such algorithms that give theoretical bounds on the future performance have not been proposed so far in the context of the classification of gene expression data. In this work, we investigate the premise of learning a conjunction (or disjunction) of decision stumps in Occam's Razor, Sample Compression, and PAC-Bayes learning settings for identifying a small subset of attributes that can be used to perform reliable classification tasks. We apply the proposed approaches for gene identification from DNA microarray data and compare our results to those of the well-known successful approaches proposed for the task. We show that our algorithm not only finds hypotheses with a much smaller number of genes while giving competitive classification accuracy but also having tight risk guarantees on future performance, unlike other approaches. The proposed approaches are general and extensible in terms of both designing novel algorithms and application to other domains. Mohak Shah, Mario Marchand, Jacques Corbeil |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2011 | A PAC-Bayes Sample-compression Approach to Kernel Methods
Pascal Germain, Alexandre Lacoste, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Sara Shanian |
ICML | 4 |
| 2011 | From PAC-Bayes Bounds to Quadratic Programs for Majority Votes
Jean-Francis Roy, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand |
ICML | 3 |
| 2010 | Learning with Randomized Majority Votes
Alexandre Lacasse, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Francis Turgeon-Boutin |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 3 |
| 2010 | Learning the set covering machine by bound minimization and margin-sparsity trade-off
François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Mohak Shah, Sara Shanian |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2009 | PAC-Bayesian learning of linear classifiersabstractWe present a general PAC-Bayes theorem from which all known PAC-Bayes risk bounds are obtained as particular cases. We also propose different learning algorithms for finding linear classifiers that minimize these bounds. These learning algorithms are generally competitive with both AdaBoost and the SVM. Pascal Germain, Alexandre Lacasse, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand |
ICML | 4 |
| 2009 | From PAC-Bayes Bounds to KL RegularizationabstractWe show that convex KL-regularized objective functions are obtained from a PAC-Bayes risk bound when using convex loss functions for the stochastic Gibbs classifier that upper-bound the standard zero-one loss used for the weighted majority vote. By restricting ourselves to a class of posteriors, that we call quasi uniform, we propose a simple coordinate descent learning algorithm to minimize the proposed KL-regularized cost function. We show that standard ellp-regularized objective functions currently used, such as ridge regression and ellp-regularized boosting, are obtained from a relaxation of the KL divergence between the quasi uniform posterior and the uniform prior. We present numerical experiments where the proposed learning algorithm generally outperforms ridge regression and AdaBoost. Pascal Germain, Alexandre Lacasse, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Sara Shanian |
NIPS | 4 |
| 2007 | Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data
Zakria Hussain, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, John Shawe-Taylor, S. Charles Brubaker, Matthew D. Mullin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2007 | PAC-Bayes Risk Bounds for Stochastic Averages and Majority Votes of Sample-Compressed Classifiers
François Laviolette, Mario Marchand |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2006 | A PAC-Bayes Risk Bound for General Loss FunctionsabstractWe provide a PAC-Bayesian bound for the expected loss of convex combinations of classifiers under a wide class of loss functions (which includes the exponential loss and the logistic loss). Our numerical experiments with Adaboost indicate that the proposed upper bound, computed on the training set, behaves very similarly as the true loss estimated on the testing set. Pascal Germain, Alexandre Lacasse, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand |
NIPS | 4 |
| 2006 | PAC-Bayes Bounds for the Risk of the Majority Vote and the Variance of the Gibbs ClassifierabstractWe propose new PAC-Bayes bounds for the risk of the weighted majority vote that depend on the mean and variance of the error of its associated Gibbs classifier. We show that these bounds can be smaller than the risk of the Gibbs classifier and can be arbitrarily close to zero even if the risk of the Gibbs classifier is close to 1/2. Moreover, we show that these bounds can be uniformly estimated on the training data for all possible posteriors Q. Moreover, they can be improved by using a large sample of unlabelled data. Alexandre Lacasse, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Pascal Germain, Nicolas Usunier |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2005 | Margin-Sparsity Trade-Off for the Set Covering Machine
François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Mohak Shah |
ECML | 2 |
| 2005 | PAC-Bayes risk bounds for sample-compressed Gibbs classifiersabstractWe extend the PAC-Bayes theorem to the sample-compression setting where each classifier is represented by two independent sources of information: a compression set which consists of a small subset of the training data, and a message string of the additional information needed to obtain a classifier. The new bound is obtained by using a prior over a data-independent set of objects where each object gives a classifier only when the training data is provided. The new PAC-Bayes theorem states that a Gibbs classifier defined on a posterior over samplecompressed classifiers can have a smaller risk bound than any such (deterministic) samplecompressed classifier. 1. François Laviolette, Mario Marchand |
ICML | 2 |
| 2005 | A PAC-Bayes approach to the Set Covering MachineabstractWe design a new learning algorithm for the Set Covering Ma- chine from a PAC-Bayes perspective and propose a PAC-Bayes risk bound which is minimized for classifiers achieving a non trivial margin-sparsity trade-off. François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Mohak Shah |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2005 | Learning with Decision Lists of Data-Dependent FeaturesabstractWe present a learning algorithm for decision lists which allows features that are constructed from the data and allows a trade-off between accuracy and complexity. We provide bounds on the generalization error of this learning algorithm in terms of the number of errors and the size of the classifier it finds on the training data. We also compare its performance on some natural data sets with the set covering machine and the support vector machine. Furthermore, we show that the proposed bounds on the generalization error provide effective guides for model selection. Mario Marchand, Marina Sokolova |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2004 | PAC-Bayes Learning of Conjunctions and Classification of Gene-Expression DataabstractWe propose a “soft greedy” learning algorithm for building small conjunctions of simple threshold functions, called rays, defined on single real-valued attributes. We also propose a PAC-Bayes risk bound which is minimized for classifiers achieving a non-trivial tradeoff between sparsity (the number of rays used) and the mag- nitude of the separating margin of each ray. Finally, we test the soft greedy algorithm on four DNA micro-array data sets. Mario Marchand, Mohak Shah |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2003 | The Set Covering Machine with Data-Dependent Half-Spaces
Mario Marchand, Mohak Shah, John Shawe-Taylor, Marina Sokolova |
ICML | 1 |
| 2002 | The Decision List MachineabstractWe introduce a new learning algorithm for decision lists to allow features that are constructed from the data and to allow a trade- ofi between accuracy and complexity. We bound its generalization error in terms of the number of errors and the size of the classifler it flnds on the training data. We also compare its performance on some natural data sets with the set covering machine and the support vector machine. Marina Sokolova, Mario Marchand, Nathalie Japkowicz, John Shawe-Taylor |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2002 | The Set Covering Machine
Mario Marchand, John Shawe-Taylor |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2001 | Learning with the Set Covering Machine
Mario Marchand, John Shawe-Taylor |
ICML | 1 |
| 1996 | On learning ?-perceptron networks on the uniform distribution
Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand, Thomas R. Hancock |
Neural Networks | 2 |
| 1995 | Strong Unimodality and Exact Learning of Constant Depth µ-Perceptron Networks
Mario Marchand, Saeed Hadjifaradji |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1994 | Learning Stochastic Perceptrons Under k-Blocking DistributionsabstractWe present a statistical method that PAC learns the class of stochastic perceptrons with arbitrary monotonic activation func(cid:173) tion and weights Wi E {-I, 0, + I} when the probability distribution that generates the input examples is member of a family that we call k-blocking distributions. Such distributions represent an impor(cid:173) tant step beyond the case where each input variable is statistically independent since the 2k-blocking family contains all the Markov distributions of order k. By stochastic percept ron we mean a per(cid:173) ceptron which, upon presentation of input vector x, outputs 1 with probability fCLJi WiXi - B). Because the same algorithm works for any monotonic (nondecreasing or nonincreasing) activation func(cid:173) tion f on Boolean domain, it handles the well studied cases of sigmolds and the "usual" radial basis functions. Mario Marchand, Saeed Hadjifaradji |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1994 | Learning Nonoverlapping Perceptron Networks from Examples and Membership Queries
Thomas R. Hancock, Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |
| 1993 | Average Case Analysis of the Clipped Hebb Rule for Nonoverlapping Perception NetworksabstractArticle Average case analysis of the clipped Hebb rule for nonoverlapping perception networks Share on Authors: Mostefa Golea View Profile , Mario Marchand View Profile Authors Info & Claims COLT '93: Proceedings of the sixth annual conference on Computational learning theoryAugust 1993 Pages 151–157https://doi.org/10.1145/168304.168323Published:01 August 1993 3citation149DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations3Total Downloads149Last 12 Months1Last 6 weeks0 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand |
COLT | 2 |
| 1993 | Polynomial Time Algorithms for Learning Neural Nets of NonoverlappingPerceptronsabstractWe investigate the problem of learning two‐layer neural nets of nonoverlapping perceptrons where each input unit is connected to one and only one hidden unit. We first show that this restricted problem with no overlap at all between the receptive fields of the hidden units is as hard as the general problem (with total overlap) if the learner uses examples only. However, if membership queries are allowed, the restricted problem is indeed easier to solve. We give a learning algorithm that uses examples and membership queries to PAC learn the intersection of K‐nonoverlapping perceptrons, regardless of whether the instance space in Boolean, discrete, or continuous. An extension of this algorithm is proven to PAC learn two‐layer nets with K‐nonoverlapping perceptrons. The simulations performed indicate that both algorithms are fast and efficient. Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand |
Comput. Intell. | 2 |
| 1993 | On Learning Perceptrons with Binary WeightsabstractWe present an algorithm that PAC learns any perceptron with binary weights and arbitrary threshold under the family of product distributions. The sample complexity of this algorithm is of O[(n/ε)4 ln(n/δ)] and its running time increases only linearly with the number of training examples. The algorithm does not try to find an hypothesis that agrees with all of the training examples; rather, it constructs a binary perceptron based on various probabilistic estimates obtained from the training examples. We show that, under the restricted case of the uniform distribution and zero threshold, the algorithm reduces to the well known clipped Hebb rule. We calculate exactly the average generalization rate (i.e., the learning curve) of the algorithm, under the uniform distribution, in the limit of an infinite number of dimensions. We find that the error rate decreases exponentially as a function of the number of training examples. Hence, the average case analysis gives a sample complexity of O[n ln(1/ε)], a large improvement over the PAC learning analysis. The analytical expression of the learning curve is in excellent agreement with the extensive numerical simulations. In addition, the algorithm is very robust with respect to classification noise. Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand |
Neural Comput. | 2 |
| 1992 | On Learning µ-Perceptron Networks with Binary Weights
Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand, Thomas R. Hancock |
NIPS | 2 |