Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

A. K. Bandyopadhyay 0002

dblp:01/4762-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1981
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › fault-tolerant architecture
fault-tolerant sequential machine
0.021981
Realization of Fault-Tolerant Machines - Linear Code Application · IEEE Trans. Computers 1981
Realization of Fault-Tolerant and Fail-Safe Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1977
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › permanent fault tolerance
stuck-at fault tolerance
0.011977
Realization of Fault-Tolerant and Fail-Safe Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1977
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code
0.011981
Realization of Fault-Tolerant Machines - Linear Code Application · IEEE Trans. Computers 1981
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › design for reliability
fail-safe design
0.011977
Realization of Fault-Tolerant and Fail-Safe Sequential Machines · IEEE Trans. Computers 1977

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

majority logic gates · 0.0linear codes · 0.0redundant state encoding · 0.0permanent and nonpermanent fault modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1981 Realization of Fault-Tolerant Machines - Linear Code Application
abstract
This correspondence deals with the fault-tolerant realization of a sequential machine using error-correcting (n,k) linear codes. Earlier works in the same area confine their attention to modified Reed-Muller Code and perfect Hamming Code and achieve the realization using a number of majority logic gates, which makes the entire realization quite complex. The realization discussed in this paper needs a smaller number of circuit components with less complexity.
A. Sengupta, D. K. Chattopadhyay, A. Palit, A. K. Bandyopadhyay 0002, Arun K. Choudhury
IEEE Trans. Computers4
1977 Realization of Fault-Tolerant and Fail-Safe Sequential Machines
abstract
Given a synchronous sequential machine M, this correspondence deals with the fault-tolerant realization M of M and also its fail-safe realization M on the assumption that the faults that can occur to the circuitry of M or M are of permanent stuck-at type and the total number of faults can be at most some preset positive integer r. First, the realization of M or M is derived for r = 1 and then the same idea is extended to have the realization for any arbitrary r. It has been shown that the realization of M is such that it is also able to tolerate faults of nonpermanent nature.
A. Sengupta, D. K. Chattopadhyay, A. Palit, A. K. Bandyopadhyay 0002, M. S. Basu, Arun K. Choudhury
IEEE Trans. Computers4