Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ashish Motivala

dblp:01/634 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1Security and privacy · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Distributed and cloud data management · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 66% Storage systems · 34%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed and cloud data management › distributed database architecture
disaggregated storage
0.412020
Building An Elastic Query Engine on Disaggregated Storage · NSDI 2020
Distributed and cloud data management › cloud database
multi-tenant database
0.212016
The Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse · SIGMOD Conference 2016
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud data management
cloud data warehouse
0.212016
The Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse · SIGMOD Conference 2016
Storage systems › distributed storage
disaggregated storage
0.112020
Building An Elastic Query Engine on Disaggregated Storage · NSDI 2020
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Building An Elastic Query Engine on Disaggregated Storage
Midhul Vuppalapati, Justin Miron, Rachit Agarwal 0001, Dan Truong, Ashish Motivala, Thierry Cruanes
NSDI5
2016 The Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse
abstract
We live in the golden age of distributed computing. Public cloud platforms now offer virtually unlimited compute and storage resources on demand. At the same time, the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) model brings enterprise-class systems to users who previously could not afford such systems due to their cost and complexity. Alas, traditional data warehousing systems are struggling to fit into this new environment. For one thing, they have been designed for fixed resources and are thus unable to leverage the cloud's elasticity. For another thing, their dependence on complex ETL pipelines and physical tuning is at odds with the flexibility and freshness requirements of the cloud's new types of semi-structured data and rapidly evolving workloads. We decided a fundamental redesign was in order. Our mission was to build an enterprise-ready data warehousing solution for the cloud. The result is the Snowflake Elastic Data Warehouse, or "Snowflake" for short. Snowflake is a multi-tenant, transactional, secure, highly scalable and elastic system with full SQL support and built-in extensions for semi-structured and schema-less data. The system is offered as a pay-as-you-go service in the Amazon cloud. Users upload their data to the cloud and can immediately manage and query it using familiar tools and interfaces. Implementation began in late 2012 and Snowflake has been generally available since June 2015. Today, Snowflake is used in production by a growing number of small and large organizations alike. The system runs several million queries per day over multiple petabytes of data.
Benoît Dageville, Thierry Cruanes, Marcin Zukowski, Vadim Antonov, Artin Avanes, Jon Bock, Jonathan Claybaugh, Daniel Engovatov, Martin Hentschel 0001, Jiansheng Huang, Allison W. Lee, Ashish Motivala, Abdul Q. Munir, Steven Pelley, Peter Povinec, Greg Rahn, Spyridon Triantafyllis, Philipp Unterbrunner
SIGMOD Conference12
2002 SWIM: Scalable Weakly-consistent Infection-style Process Group Membership Protocol
abstract
Several distributed peer-to-peer applications require weakly-consistent knowledge of process group membership information at all participating processes. SWIM is a generic software module that offers this service for large scale process groups. The SWIM effort is motivated by the unscalability of traditional heart-beating protocols, which either impose network loads that grow quadratically with group size, or compromise response times or false positive frequency w.r.t. detecting process crashes. This paper reports on the design, implementation and performance of the SWIM sub-system on a large cluster of commodity PCs. Unlike traditional heart beating protocols, SWIM separates the failure detection and membership update dissemination functionalities of the membership protocol. Processes are monitored through an efficient peer-to-peer periodic randomized probing protocol. Both the expected time to first detection of each process failure, and the expected message load per member do not vary with group size. Information about membership changes, such as process joins, drop-outs and failures, is propagated via piggybacking on ping messages and acknowledgments. This results in a robust and fast infection style (also epidemic or gossip-style) of dissemination. The rate of false failure detections in the SWIM system is reduced by modifying the protocol to allow group members to suspect a process before declaring it as failed - this allows the system to discover and rectify false failure detections. Finally, the protocol guarantees a deterministic time bound to detect failures. Experimental results from the SWIM prototype are presented. We discuss the extensibility of the design to a WAN-wide scale.
Abhinandan Das, Indranil Gupta, Ashish Motivala
DSN3