Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Federico Rossini

dblp:01/6449 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 56% Embedded and real-time systems · 44%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › fault-tolerant real-time systems
fault-tolerant scheduling
0.011999
Fault-Tolerant Rate-Monotonic First-Fit Scheduling in Hard-Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1999
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › fixed-priority scheduling
rate-monotonic scheduling
0.011999
Fault-Tolerant Rate-Monotonic First-Fit Scheduling in Hard-Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1999
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.011999
Fault-Tolerant Rate-Monotonic First-Fit Scheduling in Hard-Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1999
Distributed systems › replication
task replication
0.011999
Fault-Tolerant Rate-Monotonic First-Fit Scheduling in Hard-Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1999
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.011999
Fault-Tolerant Rate-Monotonic First-Fit Scheduling in Hard-Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1999
Distributed systems
replication
0.011999
Fault-Tolerant Rate-Monotonic First-Fit Scheduling in Hard-Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0rate-monotonic analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Fault-Tolerant Rate-Monotonic First-Fit Scheduling in Hard-Real-Time Systems
abstract
Hard-real-time systems require predictable performance despite the occurrence of failures. In this paper, fault tolerance is implemented by using a novel duplication technique where each task scheduled on a processor has either an active backup copy or a passive backup copy scheduled on a different processor. An active copy is always executed, while a passive copy is executed only in the case of a failure. First, the paper considers the ability of the widely-used rate-monotonic scheduling algorithm to meet the deadlines of periodic tasks in the presence of a processor failure. In particular, the completion time test is extended so as to check the schedulability on a single processor of a task set including backup copies. Then, the paper extends the well-known rate-monotonic first-fit assignment algorithm, where all the task copies, included the backup copies, are considered by rate-monotonic priority order and assigned to the first processor in which they fit. The proposed algorithm determines which tasks must use the active duplication and which can use the passive duplication. Passive duplication is preferred whenever possible, so as to overbook each processor with many passive copies whose primary copies are assigned to different processors. Moreover, the space allocated to active copies is reclaimed as soon as a failure is detected. Passive copy overbooking and active copy deallocation allow many passive copies to be scheduled sharing the same time intervals on the same processor, thus reducing the total number of processors needed. Simulation studies reveal a remarkable saving of processors with respect to those needed by the usual active duplication approach in which the schedule of the non-fault-tolerant case is duplicated on two sets of processors.
Alan A. Bertossi, Luigi V. Mancini, Federico Rossini
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.3