Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuheng Huang 0003
dblp:01/6508-3
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5358-4826ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning paradigms · 25% Optimization for machine learning · 25% Motion planning and robot control · 25% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
multi-objective optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | No More Tuning: Prioritized Multi-Task Learning with Lagrangian Differential Multiplier Methods · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | No More Tuning: Prioritized Multi-Task Learning with Lagrangian Differential Multiplier Methods · AAAI 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
task prioritization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | No More Tuning: Prioritized Multi-Task Learning with Lagrangian Differential Multiplier Methods · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neuron-level Structured Pruning using Polarization Regularizer · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neuron-level Structured Pruning using Polarization Regularizer · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-task learning · 0.9lagrangian differential multiplier method · 0.9polarization regularizer · 0.4l1 regularization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | No More Tuning: Prioritized Multi-Task Learning with Lagrangian Differential Multiplier MethodsabstractGiven the ubiquity of multi-task in practical systems, Multi-Task Learning (MTL) has found widespread application across diverse domains. In real-world scenarios, these tasks often have different priorities. For instance, In web search, relevance is often prioritized over other metrics, such as click-through rates or user engagement. Existing frameworks pay insufficient attention to the prioritization among different tasks, which typically adjust task-specific loss function weights to differentiate task priorities. However, this approach encounters challenges as the number of tasks grows, leading to exponential increases in hyper-parameter tuning complexity. Furthermore, the simultaneous optimization of multiple objectives can negatively impact the performance of high-priority tasks due to interference from lower-priority tasks. In this paper, we introduce a novel multi-task learning framework employing Lagrangian Differential Multiplier Methods for step-wise multi-task optimization. It is designed to boost the performance of high-priority tasks without interference from other tasks. Its primary advantage lies in its ability to automatically optimize multiple objectives without requiring balancing hyper-parameters for different tasks, thereby eliminating the need for manual tuning. Additionally, we provide theoretical analysis demonstrating that our method ensures optimization guarantees, enhancing the reliability of the process. We demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments on multiple public datasets and its application in Taobao search, a large-scale industrial search ranking system, resulting in significant improvements across various business metrics. Zhengxing Cheng, Yuheng Huang 0003, Dan Ou, Qingwen Liu 0002 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Neuron-level Structured Pruning using Polarization RegularizerabstractNeuron-level structured pruning is a very effective technique to reduce the computation of neural networks without compromising prediction accuracy. In previous works, structured pruning is usually achieved by imposing L1 regularization on the scaling factors of neurons, and pruning the neurons whose scaling factors are below a certain threshold. The reasoning is that neurons with smaller scaling factors have weaker influence on network output. A scaling factor close to 0 actually suppresses a neuron. However, L1 regularization lacks discrimination between neurons because it pushes all scaling factors towards 0. A more reasonable pruning method is to only suppress unimportant neurons (with 0 scaling factors) and simultaneously keep important neurons intact (with larger scaling factor). To achieve this goal, we propose a new regularizer on scaling factors, namely polarization regularizer. Theoretically, we prove that polarization regularizer pushes some scaling factors to 0 and others to a value $a > 0$. Experimentally, we show that structured pruning using polarization regularizer achieves much better results than using L1 regularizer. Experiments on CIFAR and ImageNet datasets show that polarization pruning achieves the state-of-the-art result to date. Yuheng Huang 0003, Xiaoyi Zeng, Kai Shuang, Xiang Li 0107 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Fine-Grained Motion Representation For Template-Free Visual TrackingabstractThe object tracking task requires tracking the arbitrary target in consecutive video frames. Recently, several attempts have been made to develop the template-free models to attain generality. However, current template-free paradigm only estimates the displacement to approximate the motion of the object. The displacement is insufficient to represent complex bounding box transformation, including scaling and rotation. We argue that the coarse-grained representation of object motion limits the performance of current template-free approaches. In this paper, we explore the finer-grained motion estimation to improve the accuracy of the template-free model. In respect of the image space, our method estimates the transformation for each pixel in the image. Concern on the motion representation, we represent the motion by the transformation parameterized by displacement, scaling, and rotation. By applying the differential vector operators on the optical flow, our approach estimates both displacement, scaling, and rotation for each pixel in a unified theory. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first work to model the displacement, scaling and rotation in a unified theory with the optical flow. To further improve the localization accuracy, we develop the appearance branch to introduce the appearance information into our model. Furthermore, to suppress optical flow estimation failure samples during training, we propose a novel loss function Limited L1. The experiment shows our model FGTrack achieves state-of-the-art performance on both NFS and VOT2017 datasets. Kai Shuang, Yuheng Huang 0003, Zhun Cai, Hao Guo 0010 |
WACV | 2 |