Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ora Arbell
dblp:01/6539
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Sequence complexity profiles of prokaryotic genomic sequences: A fast algorithm for calculating linguistic complexity · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence complexity analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Sequence complexity profiles of prokaryotic genomic sequences: A fast algorithm for calculating linguistic complexity · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › repetitive DNA analysis
simple sequence repeat detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Sequence complexity profiles of prokaryotic genomic sequences: A fast algorithm for calculating linguistic complexity · Bioinform. 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
suffix tree · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Sequence complexity profiles of prokaryotic genomic sequences: A fast algorithm for calculating linguistic complexityabstractMOTIVATION: One of the major features of genomic DNA sequences, distinguishing them from texts in most spoken or artificial languages, is their high repetitiveness. Variation in the repetitiveness of genomic texts reflects the presence and density of different biologically important messages. Thus, deviation from an expected number of repeats in both directions indicates a possible presence of a biological signal. Linguistic complexity corresponds to repetitiveness of a genomic text, and potential regulatory sites may be discovered through construction of typical patterns of complexity distribution. RESULTS: We developed software for fast calculation of linguistic sequence complexity of DNA sequences. Our program utilizes suffix trees to compute the number of subwords present in genomic sequences, thereby allowing calculation of linguistic complexity in time linear in genome size. The measure of linguistic complexity was applied to the complete genome of Haemophilus influenzae. Maps of complexity along the entire genome were obtained using sliding windows of 40, 100, and 2000 nucleotides. This approach provided an efficient way to detect simple sequence repeats in this genome. In addition, local profiles of complexity distribution around the starts of translation were constructed for 21 complete prokaryotic genomes. We hypothesize that complexity profiles correspond to evolutionary relationships between organisms. We found principal differences in profiles of the GC-rich and other (non-GC-rich) genomes. We also found characteristic differences in profiles of AT genomes, which probably reflect individual species variations in translational regulation. AVAILABILITY: The program is available upon request from Alexander Bolshoy or at http://csweb.haifa.ac.il/library/#complex. Olga G. Troyanskaya, Ora Arbell, Yair Koren, Gad M. Landau, Alexander Bolshoy |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2002 | Edit distance of run-length encoded strings
Ora Arbell, Gad M. Landau, Joseph S. B. Mitchell |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 1 |