Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arvind Raghunathan

dblp:01/6649 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 10Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
8 papers
Mathematical optimization · 94% Approximation and online algorithms · 4% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 1%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 77% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
Memory systems · 29% Embedded and real-time systems · 28% Cloud and datacenter computing · 24%

Topics — the 27 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization
0.912025
Constrained Optimization From a Control Perspective via Feedback Linearization · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › nonlinear optimization
sequential quadratic programming
0.912025
Constrained Optimization From a Control Perspective via Feedback Linearization · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › geometric deep learning
3d feature learning
0.212014
Learning to Rank 3D Features · ECCV (1) 2014
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.031993
On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993
Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990
Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990
Cloud and datacenter computing
online algorithms
0.021993
On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993
Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
online scheduling
0.021991
On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling · RTSS 1991
On-line Scheduling in the Presence of Overload · FOCS 1991
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
server problems
0.021990
Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990
Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990
Memory systems
cache management
0.011993
On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993
Memory systems › cache management
cache sharing
0.011993
On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
caching
0.011993
On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.021991
On-line Scheduling in the Presence of Overload · FOCS 1991
On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling · RTSS 1991
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis
0.021991
On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling · RTSS 1991
Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
overload scheduling
0.011991
On-line Scheduling in the Presence of Overload · FOCS 1991
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing
0.011990
Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › checkpointing
checkpoint placement
0.011990
Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › search trees
finger search
0.011990
Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design
search structures
0.011990
Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph minors
forbidden minors
0.011988
Constructive Results from Graph Minors: Linkless Embeddings · FOCS 1988
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph minors
0.011988
Constructive Results from Graph Minors: Linkless Embeddings · FOCS 1988
Graph algorithms and graph theory
topological graph theory
0.011988
Constructive Results from Graph Minors: Linkless Embeddings · FOCS 1988
Operating systems › resource management
memory management
0.011993
On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993
Operating systems › resource management › memory management
page replacement
0.011993
On-line algorithms for cache sharing · STOC 1993
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
online real-time scheduling
0.011991
On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling · RTSS 1991
Algorithms and data structures
priority queues
0.011991
On-line Scheduling in the Presence of Overload · FOCS 1991
Distributed computing theory
checkpointing
0.011990
Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990
Coding theory
source coding
0.011990
Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints · STOC 1990
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph classes
perfect graph
0.011988
Covering Orthogonal Polygons with Star Polygons: The Perfect Graph Approach · SCG 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

momentum acceleration · 0.9feedback linearization · 0.9learning to rank · 0.2competitive analysis · 0.1online algorithm design · 0.0online algorithms · 0.0online algorithm · 0.0forking servers · 0.0topological graph theory · 0.0perfect graph approach · 0.0graph minor theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Constrained Optimization From a Control Perspective via Feedback Linearization
abstract
Tools from control and dynamical systems have proven valuable for analyzing and developing optimization methods. In this paper, we establish rigorous theoretical foundations for using feedback linearization—a well-established nonlinear control technique—to solve constrained optimization problems. For equality-constrained optimization, we establish global convergence rates to first-order Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) points and uncover the close connection between the FL method and the Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) algorithm. Building on this relationship, we extend the FL approach to handle inequality-constrained problems. Furthermore, we introduce a momentum-accelerated feedback linearization algorithm and provide a rigorous convergence guarantee.
Runyu Zhang 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Jeff S. Shamma, Na Li 0002
NeurIPS2
2014 Learning to Rank 3D Features
Oncel Tuzel, Ming-Yu Liu 0001, Yuichi Taguchi, Arvind Raghunathan
ECCV (1)4
1994 On-Line Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints
Marshall W. Bern, Daniel H. Greene, Arvind Raghunathan, Madhu Sudan 0001
Algorithmica3
1994 Asynchronous PRAMs with Memory Latency
Chip Martel, Arvind Raghunathan
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.2
1993 On-line algorithms for cache sharing
abstract
A single physical computer memory may be used for more than one type of page, with the amount of memory devoted to each type under software control.For example, the effective size of memory can be increased by storing some pages in compressed form and decompressing on demand.This introduces another level to the memory hierarchy, and the sizes of two adjacent levels may be varied dynamically.We present an algorithm for varying the mixture of pages in a two-type cache, and then analyze the "competitiveness" of our algorithm.We also report progress in partially automating the design and analysis of on-line algorithms.
Marshall W. Bern, Daniel H. Greene, Arvind Raghunathan
STOC3
1992 On the Competitiveness of On-Line Real-Time Task Scheduling
Sanjoy Baruah, Gilad Koren, Decao Mao, Bud Mishra, Arvind Raghunathan, Louis E. Rosier, Dennis E. Shasha, Fuxing Wang
Real Time Syst.5
1992 The Problem of Compatible Representatives
abstract
This paper attaches a name to a natural class of combinatorial problems and points out that the class includes many important special cases. One special case, a simple problem of placing nonoverlapping labels on a rectangular map, is shown to be NP-complete.
Donald E. Knuth, Arvind Raghunathan
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
1991 On-line Scheduling in the Presence of Overload
abstract
The preemptive scheduling of sporadic tasks on a uniprocessor is considered. A task may arrive at any time, and is characterized by a value that reflects its importance, an execution time that is the amount of processor time needed to completely execute the task, and a deadline by which the task is to complete execution. The goal is to maximize the sum of the values of the completed tasks. An online scheduling algorithm that achieves optimal performance when the system is underloaded and provides a nontrivial performance guarantee when the system is overloaded is designed. The algorithm is implemented using simple data structures to run at a cost of O(log n) time per task, where n bounds the number of tasks in the system at any instant. Upper bounds on the best performance guarantee obtainable by an online algorithm in a variety of settings are derived.>
Sanjoy Baruah, Gilad Koren, Bud Mishra, Arvind Raghunathan, Louis E. Rosier, Dennis E. Shasha
FOCS4
1991 On the competitiveness of on-line real-time task scheduling
abstract
The authors study the performance of online algorithms in environments where no value is obtained for the partial execution of a request. They prove that no online scheduling algorithm can have a competitive factor greater than 0.25 times the optimal. They further refine this bound by considering the effect of the loading factor. Other models of task systems (for example, tasks systems consisting of many types of task requests), are considered. Similar upper bounds on the competitive factor that can be made by online scheduling algorithms in these environments are proved. It is shown that the performance bound of 0.25 is tight by means of a simple online uniprocessor scheduling algorithm has a competitive factor of 1/4. The authors extend the discussion to systems with dual processors. They show that the upper bound for the dual-processor online scheduling problem is 1/2 if all tasks have the same value density. This bound is tight if the tasks all also have zero laxity.>
Sanjoy Baruah, Gilad Koren, Decao Mao, Bud Mishra, Arvind Raghunathan, Louis E. Rosier, Dennis E. Shasha, Fuxing Wang
RTSS5
1990 Online Algorithms for Finger Searching (Extended Abstract)
abstract
The technique of speeding up access into search structures by maintaining fingers that point to various locations of the search structure is considered. The problem of choosing, in a large search structure, locations at which to maintain fingers is treated. In particular, a server problem in which k servers move along a line segment of length m, where m is the number of keys in the search structure, is addressed. Since fingers may be arbitrarily copied, a server is allowed to jump, or fork, to a location currently occupied by another server. Online algorithms are presented and their competitiveness analyzed. It is shown that the case in which k=2 behaves differently from the case in which k>or=3, by showing that there is a four-competitive algorithm for k=2 that never forks its fingers. For k>or=3, it is shown that any online algorithm that does not fork its fingers can be at most Omega (m/sup 1/2/)-competitive. The main result is that for k=3 there is an online algorithm that forks and is constant competitive (independent of m, the size of the search structure). The algorithm is simple and implementable.>
Richard Cole 0001, Arvind Raghunathan
FOCS2
1990 Online Algorithms for Locating Checkpoints
abstract
Motivated by applications in data compression, debugging, and physical simulation, we consider the problem of adaptively choosing locations in a long computation at which to save intermediate results.Such checkpoints allow faster recomputation of arbitrary requested points within the computation.We abstract the problem to a server problem in which k servers move along a line in a single direction, modeling the fact that most computations are not reversible.Since checkpoints may be arbitrarily copied, we allow a server to jump to any location currently occupied by another server.We present online algorithms and analyze their competitiveness.We give lower bounds on the competitiveness of any online algorithm and show that our algorithms achieve these bounds within relatively small factors.
Marshall W. Bern, Daniel H. Greene, Arvind Raghunathan, Madhu Sudan 0001
STOC3
1990 Covering Orthogonal Polygons with Star Polygons: The Perfect Graph Approach
Rajeev Motwani 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Huzur Saran
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.2
1989 Perfect Graphs and Orthogonally Convex Covers
abstract
The combinatorial structure of visibility in simple orthogonal polygons is studied. It is shown that the visibility graph of a horizontally or vertically convex polygon is a permutation graph. In general, orthogonal polygons can have concavities (dents) with four possible orientations. In the case where the polygon has three dent orientations, it is shown that the visibility graph is weakly triangulated. Since weakly triangulated graphs are perfect, a polynomial algorithm for this polygon covering problem is obtained. Furthermore, the following duality relationship is obtained. The minimum number of orthogonally convex polygons needed to cover an orthogonal polygon P with at most three dent orientations is equal to the maximum number of points of P, no two of which can be contained together in an orthogonally convex covering polygon. Finally, it shown that in the case of orthogonal polygons with all four dent orientations, the above duality relationship fails to hold.
Rajeev Motwani 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Huzur Saran
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2
1988 Covering Orthogonal Polygons with Star Polygons: The Perfect Graph Approach
abstract
We consider the problem of covering simple orthogonal polygons with star polygons. A star polygon contains a point p, such that for every point q in the star polygon, there is an orthogonally convex polygon containing p and q.
Rajeev Motwani 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Huzur Saran
SCG2
1988 Constructive Results from Graph Minors: Linkless Embeddings
abstract
A formal study of three-dimensional topological graph theory is initiated. The problem of deciding whether a graph can be embedded in 3-space so that no collection of vertex-disjoint cycles is topologically linked is considered first. The Robertson-Seymour Theory of Graph Minors is applicable to this problem and guarantees the existence of an O(n/sup 3/) algorithm for the decision problem. However, not even a finite-time decision procedure was known for this problem. A small set of forbidden minors for linkless embeddable graphs is exhibited, and it is shown that any graph with these minors cannot be embedded without linked cycles. It is further established that any graph that does not contain these minors is embeddable without linked cycles. Thus, an O(n/sup 3/) algorithm for the decision problem is demonstrated. It is believed that the proof technique will lead to an algorithm for actually embedding a graph, provided it does not contain the forbidden minors.>
Rajeev Motwani 0001, Arvind Raghunathan, Huzur Saran
FOCS2