Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Marija Dodig

dblp:01/7659 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0001-8209-6920ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction
0.112012
Optimal Metric Projections for Deformable and Articulated Structure-from-Motion · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2012
Geometric modeling and processing › 3d reconstruction
structure from motion
0.112012
Optimal Metric Projections for Deformable and Articulated Structure-from-Motion · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2012
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › object reconstruction
articulated object reconstruction
0.112009
Factorization for non-rigid and articulated structure using metric projections · CVPR 2009
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape reconstruction
deformable shape reconstruction
0.112009
Factorization for non-rigid and articulated structure using metric projections · CVPR 2009
Computer vision › 3D vision › structure from motion
non-rigid structure from motion
0.112009
Factorization for non-rigid and articulated structure using metric projections · CVPR 2009
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.112009
Factorization for non-rigid and articulated structure using metric projections · CVPR 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metric projection · 0.2iterative factorization · 0.1alternating least squares · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Optimal Metric Projections for Deformable and Articulated Structure-from-Motion
Marco Paladini, Alessio Del Bue, João M. F. Xavier, Lourdes Agapito, Marko Stosic, Marija Dodig
Int. J. Comput. Vis.6
2009 Factorization for non-rigid and articulated structure using metric projections
abstract
This paper describes a new algorithm for recovering the 3D shape and motion of deformable and articulated objects purely from uncalibrated 2D image measurements using an iterative factorization approach. Most solutions to non-rigid and articulated structure from motion require metric constraints to be enforced on the motion matrix to solve for the transformation that upgrades the solution to metric space. While in the case of rigid structure the metric upgrade step is simple since the motion constraints are linear, deformability in the shape introduces non-linearities. In this paper we propose an alternating least-squares approach associated with a globally optimal projection step onto the manifold of metric constraints. An important advantage of this new algorithm is its ability to handle missing data which becomes crucial when dealing with real video sequences with self-occlusions. We show successful results of our algorithms on synthetic and real sequences of both deformable and articulated data.
Marco Paladini, Alessio Del Bue, Marko Stosic, Marija Dodig, João M. F. Xavier, Lourdes Agapito
CVPR4
2009 2D-3D registration of deformable shapes with manifold projection Alessio Del Bue
abstract
We present an algorithm able to register a known 3D deformable model to a set of 2D matched points extracted from a single image. Unlike previous approaches, the problem is solved simultaneously for both the rigid and non-rigid parameters of the model. The key advantage of our approach is the projection of an initial affine estimation of the motion parameters into the motion manifold corresponding to the exact parametrization of the problem. This projection is formulated as theminimization of the distance between the affine solution and the surface of the manifold. Such optimization results in a quadratically constrained quadratic minimization problem that can be efficiently solved with standard optimization tools. Synthetic and real tests demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach.
Alessio Del Bue, Marko Stosic, Marija Dodig, João M. F. Xavier
ICIP3