Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Srini Seetharaman

dblp:01/8356 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 4Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Routing and switching · 34% Network measurement and analytics · 33% Internet of things and sensor networks · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network measurement and analytics › traffic measurement
traffic monitoring
0.322012
MeasuRouting: A Framework for Routing Assisted Traffic Monitoring · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2012
MeasuRouting: A Framework for Routing Assisted Traffic Monitoring · INFOCOM 2010
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
network diagnosis
0.112011
OFRewind: Enabling Record and Replay Troubleshooting for Networks · USENIX ATC 2011
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
record and replay
0.112011
OFRewind: Enabling Record and Replay Troubleshooting for Networks · USENIX ATC 2011
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112011
OFRewind: Enabling Record and Replay Troubleshooting for Networks · USENIX ATC 2011
Routing and switching › routing protocol
intra-domain routing
0.112010
MeasuRouting: A Framework for Routing Assisted Traffic Monitoring · INFOCOM 2010
Routing and switching
traffic engineering
0.112010
MeasuRouting: A Framework for Routing Assisted Traffic Monitoring · INFOCOM 2010
Routing and switching › traffic engineering
intra-domain traffic engineering
0.012012
MeasuRouting: A Framework for Routing Assisted Traffic Monitoring · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

traffic engineering · 0.1optimization · 0.1theoretical framework · 0.1simulation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 State Abstraction and Management in Software-Defined Networks
abstract
SDN-enabled networks offer a great degree of flexibility, programmability and support for multiple applications. Applications running on top of a SDN controller could further benefit if network state information were made available to them as part of the SDN framework. Our work investigates the requirements for abstracting network state on the control plane. We intend to show that, by meeting these pre-requisites, network state can be made available with the guarantee of state safety and integrity. We envision that our state management abstraction will provide safety in the data plane and aid better programmability in the control plane.
Abhishek Dwaraki, Srini Seetharaman, Sriram Natarajan, Tilman Wolf
ANCS2
2012 A flexible in-network IP anonymization service
abstract
User privacy on the Internet has been an increasing concern in recent years. With the proliferation and sophistication of information services, data mining, and search engines, a simple network address may be used to reveal a great deal of information about a user, including location, identity, and behavior. Existing approaches to privacy, however, make unacceptable tradeoffs between performance and anonymity. For example, Tor [5] attempts to provide strong anonymity by withholding trust from third-party relays. We believe an acceptable level of privacy can be provided to most users, with noticeably lower latency and throughput impact, by working with the network provider. In this paper, we introduce AnonyFlow, an in-network anonymization service designed to efficiently and seamlessly provide privacy to users as they communicate with other endpoints and services. We design, implement, and evaluate an OpenFlow-based prototype of AnonyFlow that achieves endpoint anonymity without compromising on throughput or latency.
Marc Mendonca, Srini Seetharaman, Katia Obraczka
ICC2
2012 MeasuRouting: A Framework for Routing Assisted Traffic Monitoring
abstract
Monitoring transit traffic at one or more points in a network is of interest to network operators for reasons of traffic accounting, debugging or troubleshooting, forensics, and traffic engineering. Previous research in the area has focused on deriving a placement of monitors across the network toward the end of maximizing the monitoring utility of the network operator for a given traffic routing. However, both traffic characteristics and measurement objectives can dynamically change over time, rendering a previously optimal placement of monitors suboptimal. It is not feasible to dynamically redeploy/reconfigure measurement infrastructure to cater to such evolving measurement requirements. We address this problem by strategically routing traffic subpopulations over fixed monitors. We refer to this approach as MeasuRouting. The main challenge for MeasuRouting is to work within the constraints of existing intradomain traffic engineering operations that are geared for efficiently utilizing bandwidth resources, or meeting quality-of-service (QoS) constraints, or both. A fundamental feature of intradomain routing, which makes MeasuRouting feasible, is that intradomain routing is often specified for aggregate flows. MeasuRouting can therefore differentially route components of an aggregate flow while ensuring that the aggregate placement is compliant to original traffic engineering objectives. In this paper, we present a theoretical framework for MeasuRouting. Furthermore, as proofs of concept, we present synthetic and practical monitoring applications to showcase the utility enhancement achieved with MeasuRouting.
Saqib Raza, Guanyao Huang, Chen-Nee Chuah, Srini Seetharaman, Jatinder Pal Singh
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.4
2011 OFRewind: Enabling Record and Replay Troubleshooting for Networks
Andreas Wundsam, Dan Levin, Srini Seetharaman, Anja Feldmann
USENIX ATC3
2010 MeasuRouting: A Framework for Routing Assisted Traffic Monitoring
abstract
Monitoring transit traffic at one or more points in a network is of interest to network operators for reasons of traffic accounting, debugging or troubleshooting, forensics, and traffic engineering. Previous research in the area has focused on deriving a placement of monitors across the network towards the end of maximizing the monitoring utility of the network operator for a given traffic routing. However, both traffic characteristics and measurement objectives can dynamically change over time, rendering a previously optimal placement of monitors suboptimal. It is not feasible to dynamically redeploy/reconfigure measurement infrastructure to cater to such evolving measurement requirements. We address this problem by strategically routing traffic sub-populations over fixed monitors. We refer to this approach as MeasuRouting. The main challenge for MeasuRouting is to work within the constraints of existing intra-domain traffic engineering operations that are geared for efficiently utilizing bandwidth resources, or meeting Quality of Service (QoS) constraints, or both. A fundamental feature of intra-domain routing, that makes MeasuRouting feasible, is that intra-domain routing is often specified for aggregate flows. MeasuRouting, can therefore, differentially route components of an aggregate flow while ensuring that the aggregate placement is compliant to original traffic engineering objectives. In this paper we present a theoretical framework for MeasuRouting. Furthermore, as proofs-of-concept, we present synthetic and practical monitoring applications to showcase the utility enhancement achieved with MeasuRouting.
Saqib Raza, Guanyao Huang, Chen-Nee Chuah, Srini Seetharaman, Jatinder Pal Singh
INFOCOM4