Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert V. Kohn
dblp:01/9341
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 87% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 13% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
prediction with expert advice |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory
optimal control |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
potential function |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
zero-sum game |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert Advice · COLT 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supersolutions · 0.9subsolutions · 0.9partial differential equations · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | New Potential-Based Bounds for Prediction with Expert AdviceabstractThis work addresses the classic machine learning problem of online prediction with expert advice. We consider the finite-horizon version of this zero-sum, two-person game. Using verification arguments from optimal control theory, we view the task of finding better lower and upper bounds on the value of the game (regret) as the problem of finding better sub- and supersolutions of certain partial differential equations (PDEs). These sub- and supersolutions serve as the potentials for player and adversary strategies, which lead to the corresponding bounds. To get explicit bounds, we use closed-form solutions of specific PDEs. Our bounds hold for any given number of experts and horizon; in certain regimes (which we identify) they improve upon the previous state of the art. For two and three experts, our bounds provide the optimal leading order term. Vladimir A. Kobzar, Robert V. Kohn, Zhilei Wang |
COLT | 2 |