EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Taewon Cho
dblp:02/1144
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational geometry · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 50% Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Line Graph Vietoris-Rips Persistence Diagram for Topological Graph Representation Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Line Graph Vietoris-Rips Persistence Diagram for Topological Graph Representation Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
line graph |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Line Graph Vietoris-Rips Persistence Diagram for Topological Graph Representation Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › topological data analysis
persistence diagram |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Line Graph Vietoris-Rips Persistence Diagram for Topological Graph Representation Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Computational geometry
topological data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Line Graph Vietoris-Rips Persistence Diagram for Topological Graph Representation Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › special-purpose processor
network processor |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Processor Scheduler for Multi-Service Routers · RTSS 2006 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling › resource scheduling
service scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Processor Scheduler for Multi-Service Routers · RTSS 2006 |
Network performance modeling › delay analysis
packet delay |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Processor Scheduler for Multi-Service Routers · RTSS 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weisfeiler-lehman coloring · 1.5message passing · 1.5scheduling algorithm · 0.1prototype implementation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Universal embedding for pre-trained models and data bench
Namkyeong Cho, Taewon Cho, Jaesun Shin, Eunjoo Jeon |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2024 | Line Graph Vietoris-Rips Persistence Diagram for Topological Graph Representation LearningabstractWhile message passing graph neural networks result in informative node embeddings, they may suffer from describing the topological properties of graphs. To this end, node filtration has been widely used as an attempt to obtain the topological information of a graph using persistence diagrams. However, these attempts have faced the problem of losing node embedding information, which in turn prevents them from providing a more expressive graph representation. To tackle this issue, we shift our focus to edge filtration and introduce a novel edge filtration-based persistence diagram, named Topological Edge Diagram (TED), which is mathematically proven to preserve node embedding information as well as contain additional topological information. To implement TED, we propose a neural network based algorithm, named Line Graph Vietoris-Rips (LGVR) Persistence Diagram, that extracts edge information by transforming a graph into its line graph. Through LGVR, we propose two model frameworks that can be applied to any message passing GNNs, and prove that they are strictly more powerful than Weisfeiler-Lehman type colorings. Finally we empirically validate superior performance of our models on several graph classification and regression benchmarks. Jaesun Shin, Eunjoo Jeon, Taewon Cho, Namkyeong Cho, Youngjune Gwon |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2006 | Processor Scheduler for Multi-Service RoutersabstractIn this paper, we describe the design and evaluation of a scheduler (referred to as Everest) for allocating processors to services in high performance, multi-service routers. A scheduler for such routers is required to maximize the number of packets processed within a given delay tolerance, while isolating the performance of services from each other. The design of such a scheduler is novel and challenging because of three domain-specific characteristics: (1) difficult-to-predict and high packet arrival rates, (2) small delay tolerances of packets, and (3) significant overheads for switching allocation of processors from one service to another. These characteristics require that the scheduler be agile and wary simultaneously. Whereas agility enables the scheduler to react quickly to fluctuations in packet arrival rates, wariness prevents the scheduler from wasting computational resources in unnecessary context switches. We demonstrate that by balancing agility and wariness, Everest, as compared to conventional schedulers, reduces by more than an order of magnitude the average delay and the percentage of packets that experience delays greater than their tolerance. We describe a prototype implementation of Everest on Intel's IXP2400 network processor Ravi Kokku, Upendra Shevade, Nishit Shah, Ajay Mahimkar, Taewon Cho, Harrick M. Vin |
RTSS | 5 |