Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marc Mézard
dblp:02/1355
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4591-3893ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 4 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Learning theory · 29% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 46% Information theory · 27% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 27% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in Training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in Training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Transformers Learn Structured Data: Insights From Hierarchical Filtering · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
memorization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in Training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in Training · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Transformers Learn Structured Data: Insights From Hierarchical Filtering · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › neural network interpretation
transformer interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How Transformers Learn Structured Data: Insights From Hierarchical Filtering · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student model · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
kernel regression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student model · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
learning curves |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student model · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
teacher-student framework |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student model · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization error |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold model · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
random features |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold model · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
matrix factorization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Phase Transitions and Sample Complexity in Bayes-Optimal Matrix Factorization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Phase Transitions and Sample Complexity in Bayes-Optimal Matrix Factorization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation › image representation
feature map |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student model · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
random projection |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student model · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › over-parameterization
double descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold model · ICML 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures
group testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Group Testing With Random Pools: Optimal Two-Stage Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
approximate message passing |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Phase Transitions and Sample Complexity in Bayes-Optimal Matrix Factorization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2016 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph theory |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Group Testing With Random Pools: Optimal Two-Stage Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph classes
regular bipartite graphs |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Group Testing With Random Pools: Optimal Two-Stage Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
replica method · 0.9u-net · 0.9random features model · 0.9probing · 0.9attention map analysis · 0.9teacher-student framework · 0.5state evolution · 0.5scattering transform · 0.5cavity method · 0.5neural tangent kernel · 0.4statistical mechanics · 0.2probabilistic method · 0.1asymptotic analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | How Transformers Learn Structured Data: Insights From Hierarchical FilteringabstractUnderstanding the learning process and the embedded computation in transformers is becoming a central goal for the development of interpretable AI. In the present study, we introduce a hierarchical filtering procedure for data models of sequences on trees, allowing us to hand-tune the range of positional correlations in the data. Leveraging this controlled setting, we provide evidence that vanilla encoder-only transformers can approximate the exact inference algorithm when trained on root classification and masked language modeling tasks, and study *how* this computation is discovered and implemented. We find that correlations at larger distances, corresponding to increasing layers of the hierarchy, are sequentially included by the network during training.
By comparing attention maps from models trained with varying degrees of filtering and by probing the different encoder levels, we find clear evidence of a reconstruction of correlations on successive length scales corresponding to the various levels of the hierarchy, which we relate to a plausible implementation of the exact inference algorithm within the same architecture. Jerome Garnier-Brun, Marc Mézard, Emanuele Moscato, Luca Saglietti |
ICML | 2 |
| 2025 | Why Diffusion Models Don't Memorize: The Role of Implicit Dynamical Regularization in TrainingabstractDiffusion models have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of generative tasks. A key challenge is understanding the mechanisms that prevent their memorization of training data and allow generalization. In this work, we investigate the role of the training dynamics in the transition from generalization to memorization. Through extensive experiments and theoretical analysis, we identify two distinct timescales: an early time $\tau_\mathrm{gen}$ at which models begin to generate high-quality samples, and a later time $\tau_\mathrm{mem}$ beyond which memorization emerges. Crucially, we find that $\tau_\mathrm{mem}$ increases linearly with the training set size $n$, while $\tau_\mathrm{gen}$ remains constant. This creates a growing window of training times with $n$ where models generalize effectively, despite showing strong memorization if training continues beyond it. It is only when $n$ becomes larger than a model-dependent threshold that overfitting disappears at infinite training times.
These findings reveal a form of implicit dynamical regularization in the training dynamics, which allow to avoid memorization even in highly overparameterized settings. Our results are supported by numerical experiments with standard U-Net architectures on realistic and synthetic datasets, and by a theoretical analysis using a tractable random features model studied in the high-dimensional limit. Tony Bonnaire, Raphaël Urfin, Giulio Biroli, Marc Mézard |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student modelabstractTeacher-student models provide a framework in which the typical-case performance of high-dimensional supervised learning can be described in closed form. The assumptions of Gaussian i.i.d. input data underlying the canonical teacher-student model may, however, be perceived as too restrictive to capture the behaviour of realistic data sets. In this paper, we introduce a Gaussian covariate generalisation of the model where the teacher and student can act on different spaces, generated with fixed, but generic feature maps. While still solvable in a closed form, this generalization is able to capture the learning curves for a broad range of realistic data sets, thus redeeming the potential of the teacher-student framework. Our contribution is then two-fold: first, we prove a rigorous formula for the asymptotic training loss and generalisation error. Second, we present a number of situations where the learning curve of the model captures the one of a realistic data set learned with kernel regression and classification, with out-of-the-box feature maps such as random projections or scattering transforms, or with pre-learned ones - such as the features learned by training multi-layer neural networks. We discuss both the power and the limitations of the framework. Bruno Loureiro, Cédric Gerbelot, Hugo Cui, Sebastian Goldt, Florent Krzakala, Marc Mézard, Lenka Zdeborová |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2020 | Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelabstractWe study generalised linear regression and classification for a synthetically generated dataset encompassing different problems of interest, such as learning with random features, neural networks in the lazy training regime, and the hidden manifold model. We consider the high-dimensional regime and using the replica method from statistical physics, we provide a closed-form expression for the asymptotic generalisation performance in these problems, valid in both the under- and over-parametrised regimes and for a broad choice of generalised linear model loss functions. In particular, we show how to obtain analytically the so-called double descent behaviour for logistic regression with a peak at the interpolation threshold, we illustrate the superiority of orthogonal against random Gaussian projections in learning with random features, and discuss the role played by correlations in the data generated by the hidden manifold model. Beyond the interest in these particular problems, the theoretical formalism introduced in this manuscript provides a path to further extensions to more complex tasks. Federica Gerace, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala, Marc Mézard, Lenka Zdeborová |
ICML | 4 |
| 2017 | Multi-layer generalized linear estimationabstractWe consider the problem of reconstructing a signal from multi-layered (possibly) non-linear measurements. Using non-rigorous but standard methods from statistical physics we present the Multi-Layer Approximate Message Passing (ML-AMP) algorithm for computing marginal probabilities of the corresponding estimation problem and derive the associated state evolution equations to analyze its performance. We also give the expression of the asymptotic free energy and the minimal information-theoretically achievable reconstruction error. Finally, we present some applications of this measurement model for compressed sensing and perceptron learning with structured matrices/patterns, and for a simple model of estimation of latent variables in an auto-encoder. Andre Manoel, Florent Krzakala, Marc Mézard, Lenka Zdeborová |
ISIT | 3 |
| 2016 | Phase Transitions and Sample Complexity in Bayes-Optimal Matrix FactorizationabstractWe analyze the matrix factorization problem. Given a noisy measurement of a product of two matrices, the problem is to estimate back the original matrices. It arises in many applications, such as dictionary learning, blind matrix calibration, sparse principal component analysis, blind source separation, low rank matrix completion, robust principal component analysis, or factor analysis. It is also important in machine learning: unsupervised representation learning can often be studied through matrix factorization. We use the tools of statistical mechanics-the cavity and replica methods-to analyze the achievability and computational tractability of the inference problems in the setting of Bayes-optimal inference, which amounts to assuming that the two matrices have random-independent elements generated from some known distribution, and this information is available to the inference algorithm. In this setting, we compute the minimal mean-squared-error achievable, in principle, in any computational time, and the error that can be achieved by an efficient approximate message passing algorithm. The computation is based on the asymptotic state-evolution analysis of the algorithm. The performance that our analysis predicts, both in terms of the achieved mean-squared-error and in terms of sample complexity, is extremely promising and motivating for a further development of the algorithm. Yoshiyuki Kabashima, Florent Krzakala, Marc Mézard, Ayaka Sakata, Lenka Zdeborová |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |
| 2013 | Compressed sensing under matrix uncertainty: Optimum thresholds and robust approximate message passingabstractIn compressed sensing one measures sparse signals directly in a compressed form via a linear transform and then reconstructs the original signal. However, it is often the case that the linear transform itself is known only approximately, a situation called matrix uncertainty, and that the measurement process is noisy. Here we present two contributions to this problem: first, we use the replica method to determine the mean-squared error of the Bayes-optimal reconstruction of sparse signals under matrix uncertainty. Second, we consider a robust variant of the approximate message passing algorithm and demonstrate numerically that in the limit of large systems, this algorithm matches the optimal performance in a large region of parameters. Florent Krzakala, Marc Mézard, Lenka Zdeborová |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2013 | Phase diagram and approximate message passing for blind calibration and dictionary learningabstractWe consider dictionary learning and blind calibration for signals and matrices created from a random ensemble. We study the mean-squared error in the limit of large signal dimension using the replica method and unveil the appearance of phase transitions delimiting impossible, possible-but-hard and possible inference regions. We also introduce an approximate message passing algorithm that asymptotically matches the theoretical performance, and show through numerical tests that it performs very well, for the calibration problem, for tractable system sizes. Florent Krzakala, Marc Mézard, Lenka Zdeborová |
ISIT | 2 |
| 2011 | Special Section on Constraint Satisfaction Problems and Message Passing Algorithms
Marc Mézard, Prasad Tetali |
SIAM J. Discret. Math. | 1 |
| 2011 | Group Testing With Random Pools: Optimal Two-Stage AlgorithmsabstractWe study the group testing of a set of N items each of which is defective with probability p. We focus on the double limit of small defect probability, p ≪ 1, and large number of variables, N ≫ 1, taking either p → 0 after N → ∝ or p = 1/Nβwith β ∈ (0,1/2). In both settings the optimal number of tests which are required to identify with certainty the defectives via a two-stage procedure, T̅(N, p), is known to scale as Np |log p|. Here we determine the sharp asymptotic value of T̅(N,p)/(Np|log p|) and construct a class of two-stage algorithms over which this optimal value is attained. This is done by choosing a proper bipartite regular graph (of tests and variable nodes) for the first stage of the detection. Furthermore we prove that this optimal value is also attained on average over a random bipartite graph where all variables have the same degree and the tests connected to a given variable are randomly chosen with uniform distribution among all tests. Finally, we improve the existing upper and lower bounds for the optimal number of tests in the case p = 1/Nβwith β ∈ [1/2,1). Marc Mézard, Cristina Toninelli |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2008 | Pairs of SAT-assignments in random Boolean formulæ
Hervé Daudé, Marc Mézard, Thierry Mora, Riccardo Zecchina |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 1992 | On The Mean Field Theory of Random HeteropolymersabstractWe discuss some of the problems appearing in the Mean Field Theory of Random Heteropolymers. We show how an hypothesis of replica symmetry maps this problem onto a directed polymer in a random potential, and explain how this hypothesis can be checked through numerical simulations on directed polymers. The approach of Shaknovitch and Gutin is also reviewed in light of these findings. Silvio Franz, Marc Mézard, Giorgio Parisi |
Int. J. Neural Syst. | 2 |