Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael A. Gogola
dblp:02/2403
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Robot manipulation · 53% Motion planning and robot control · 24% Legged, aerial and field robots · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Energy systems and smart grids · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › actuator design
pneumatic actuation |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Modeling and control of a monopropellant-based pneumatic actuation system · ICRA 2003 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot actuation
robot actuator |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Development of a Hot Gas Actuator for Self-Powered Robots · ICRA 2003 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
legged robots |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Monopropellant Powered Actuators for use in Autonomous Human-Scaled Robotics · ICRA 2002 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model-based control |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Modeling and control of a monopropellant-based pneumatic actuation system · ICRA 2003 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Development of a Hot Gas Actuator for Self-Powered Robots · ICRA 2003 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › hybrid control
switching control |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Modeling and control of a monopropellant-based pneumatic actuation system · ICRA 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
system design comparison · 0.1model-based switching control · 0.0liquid propellant · 0.0energetic modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | Modeling and control of a monopropellant-based pneumatic actuation systemabstractThis work describes the modeling and control of a proposed actuation system that is capable of pressurizing a chamber volume via the catalytic decomposition of a liquid monopropellant controlled by a binary on/off propellant valve. Two design configurations of the actuation system are presented and common portions of both are energetically modeled. The parameters of the resulting dynamic model are meaningful physical properties of either the propellant or the system. A model-based switching controller is then applied to the task of pressure tracking. Model validation and controller performance are shown experimentally. Eric J. Barth, Michael A. Gogola, Michael Goldfarb |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2003 | Development of a Hot Gas Actuator for Self-Powered RobotsabstractThis paper describes the design of a liquid-propellant-powered hot-gas actuator appropriate for human-scale power-autonomous robots. A prototype of the actuation system is described, and closed-loop tracking data is shown that demonstrates good motion control. Experiments to characterize the energetic performance of the actuation system indicate that the proposed system with a diluted propellant offers an energetic figure of merit five times greater than a battery-powered by undiluted propellant would offer an energetic figure of merit an order of magnitude greater than battery-powered DC motor actuated systems. Michael Goldfarb, Eric J. Barth, Michael A. Gogola, Joseph A. Wehrmeyer |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2002 | Monopropellant Powered Actuators for use in Autonomous Human-Scaled RoboticsabstractThis paper presents a liquid-fuel powered pneumatic actuator appropriate for human-scale autonomous robotics. The motivation for this work is the development of a lightweight actuation system with system energy and power densities significantly greater than a DC motor and battery combination. For the scale of interest, the design tradeoffs between complexity of an energy conversion system and fuel specific energy density make many conventional approaches inappropriate. Conventional actuation, such as a battery powered DC motor system, does not possess adequate energy storage to perform significant amounts of mechanical work for significant periods of time autonomously. A system design comparison for a six-degree of freedom walking robot is presented which compares the expected performance of a monopropellant powered actuation system to a battery powered DC motor system. Results from this comparison demonstrate the viability of such an approach and indicate significant increases in energy and power densities. A single-degree of freedom manipulator was constructed to demonstrate this approach. Experimental results corroborate the expected energetic advantages. Michael A. Gogola, Eric J. Barth, Michael Goldfarb |
ICRA | 1 |