Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William J. Knight

dblp:02/2652 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
binary search
0.011988
Search in an Ordered Array Having Variable Probe Cost · SIAM J. Comput. 1988
Algorithms and data structures
search algorithms
0.011988
Search in an Ordered Array Having Variable Probe Cost · SIAM J. Comput. 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expected cost analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 Search in an Ordered Array Having Variable Probe Cost
abstract
Steiglitz and Parks [“What Is the Filter-Design Problem?,” Proc. 1986 Princeton Conference on Information Science and Systems, B. W. Dickenson, ed., Princeton University, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Princeton, NJ, 1986] have shown that a problem in filter design gives rise to a related problem of how to search an ordered array in which the cost of a probe into the array varies with the location being probed. In this paper we prove that if probing in location k has cost $k^p $, where p is a positive integer, then the expected cost of a successful or unsuccessful search for a target element is at least $(p + 1)^{ - 1} n^p \lg n + O(n^p )$. We also prove the somewhat surprising fact that ordinary binary search has this expected cost. However, for the case $p = 1$ we describe what appears to be a marginally better search algorithm.
William J. Knight
SIAM J. Comput.1