Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William J. Knight
dblp:02/2652
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
binary search |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Search in an Ordered Array Having Variable Probe Cost · SIAM J. Comput. 1988 |
Algorithms and data structures
search algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | Search in an Ordered Array Having Variable Probe Cost · SIAM J. Comput. 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
expected cost analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | Search in an Ordered Array Having Variable Probe CostabstractSteiglitz and Parks [“What Is the Filter-Design Problem?,” Proc. 1986 Princeton Conference on Information Science and Systems, B. W. Dickenson, ed., Princeton University, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Princeton, NJ, 1986] have shown that a problem in filter design gives rise to a related problem of how to search an ordered array in which the cost of a probe into the array varies with the location being probed. In this paper we prove that if probing in location k has cost $k^p $, where p is a positive integer, then the expected cost of a successful or unsuccessful search for a target element is at least $(p + 1)^{ - 1} n^p \lg n + O(n^p )$. We also prove the somewhat surprising fact that ordinary binary search has this expected cost. However, for the case $p = 1$ we describe what appears to be a marginally better search algorithm. William J. Knight |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |