Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

M. David Allen

dblp:02/3013 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Query processing and optimization · 54% Graph data management · 46%
Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
query execution
0.112012
Intuitive Interaction with Encrypted Query Execution in DataStorm · ICDE 2012
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving query processing
encrypted query processing
0.112012
Intuitive Interaction with Encrypted Query Execution in DataStorm · ICDE 2012
Graph data management
path query
0.112011
Surrogate Parenthood: Protected and Informative Graphs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving data processing
graph data privacy
0.112011
Surrogate Parenthood: Protected and Informative Graphs · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

secure execution planning · 0.3surrogate nodes and edges · 0.2opacity measure · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 What do we do now? Workflows for an unpredictable world
M. David Allen, Adriane Chapman, Barbara T. Blaustein, Lisa Mak
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.1
2012 Intuitive Interaction with Encrypted Query Execution in DataStorm
abstract
The encrypted execution of database queries promises powerful security protections, however users are currently unlikely to benefit without significant expertise. In this demonstration, we illustrate a simple workflow enabling users to design secure executions of their queries. The Data Storm system demonstrated simplifies both the design and execution of encrypted execution plans, and represents progress toward the challenge of developing a general planner for encrypted query execution.
Kenneth P. Smith, Ameet Kini, Chris Wolf, M. David Allen, Andrew Sillers
ICDE5
2011 Provenance for collaboration: Detecting suspicious behaviors and assessing trust in information
abstract
Data collaborations allow users to draw upon diverse resources to solve complex problems. While collaborations enable a greater ability to manipulate data and services, they also create new security vulnerabilities. Collaboration participants need methods to detect suspicious behaviors (potentially
M. David Allen, Adriane Chapman, Leonard J. Seligman, Barbara T. Blaustein
CollaborateCom1
2011 Surrogate Parenthood: Protected and Informative Graphs
abstract
Many applications, including provenance and some analyses of social networks, require path-based queries over graphstructured data. When these graphs contain sensitive information, paths may be broken, resulting in uninformative query results. This paper presents innovative techniques that give users more informative graph query results; the techniques leverage a common industry practice of providing what we call surrogates: alternate, less sensitive versions of nodes and edges releasable to a broader community. We describe techniques for interposing surrogate nodes and edges to protect sensitive graph components, while maximizing graph connectivity and giving users as much information as possible. In this work, we formalize the problem of creating a protected account G' of a graph G. We provide a utility measure to compare the informativeness of alternate protected accounts and an opacity measure for protected accounts, which indicates the likelihood that an attacker can recreate the topology of the original graph from the protected account. We provide an algorithm to create a maximally useful protected account of a sensitive graph, and show through evaluation with the PLUS prototype that using surrogates and protected accounts adds value for the user, with no significant impact on the time required to generate results for graph queries.
Barbara T. Blaustein, Adriane Chapman, Leonard J. Seligman, M. David Allen, Arnon Rosenthal
Proc. VLDB Endow.4
2009 The Role of Schema Matching in Large Enterprises
Kenneth P. Smith, Michael Morse, Kris Mork, Maya Hao Li, Arnon Rosenthal, M. David Allen, Leonard J. Seligman
CIDR6