Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Janina Reeder

dblp:02/3142 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-6704-6754ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational microbiology › microbiome analysis
microbial community analysis
0.512021
MicrobiomeExplorer: an R package for the analysis and visualization of microbial communities · Bioinform. 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational microbiology
microbiome analysis
0.512021
MicrobiomeExplorer: an R package for the analysis and visualization of microbial communities · Bioinform. 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

shiny application · 0.5r package · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 MicrobiomeExplorer: an R package for the analysis and visualization of microbial communities
abstract
SUMMARY: We developed the MicrobiomeExplorer R package to facilitate the analysis and visualization of microbial communities. The MicrobiomeExplorer R package allows a user to perform typical microbiome analytic workflows and visualize their results, either through the command line or an interactive Shiny application included with the package. In addition to applying common analytical workflows, the application enables automated analysis report generation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Available at https://github.com/zoecastillo/microbiomeExplorer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Janina Reeder, Mo Huang, Joshua S. Kaminker, Joseph N. Paulson
Bioinform.1
2006 A graphical programming system for molecular motif search
abstract
We describe a graphical programming system for a domain specific language in biosequence analysis. It supports the development of programs for RNA structure prediction and motif search, created by biologists with little or no programming skills. The system combines several programming paradigms in a productive way. It has a client - server architecture, with a transport layer in XML. The graphical front-end is implemented in the object-oriented paradigm (using Java). Graphics are compiled into a declarative domain-specific language for dynamic programming (ADP) that is embedded in Haskell. Finally, motif search programs expressed in ADP are compiled to imperative code in C, a step which includes substantial domain-specific optimization.
Janina Reeder, Robert Giegerich
GPCE1
2005 Effective ambiguity checking in biosequence analysis
abstract
BACKGROUND: Ambiguity is a problem in biosequence analysis that arises in various analysis tasks solved via dynamic programming, and in particular, in the modeling of families of RNA secondary structures with stochastic context free grammars. Several types of analysis are invalidated by the presence of ambiguity. As this problem inherits undecidability (as we show here) from the namely problem for context free languages, there is no complete algorithmic solution to the problem of ambiguity checking. RESULTS: We explain frequently observed sources of ambiguity, and show how to avoid them. We suggest four testing procedures that may help to detect ambiguity when present, including a just-in-time test that permits to work safely with a potentially ambiguous grammar. We introduce, for the special case of stochastic context free grammars and RNA structure modeling, an automated partial procedure for proving non-ambiguity. It is used to demonstrate non-ambiguity for several relevant grammars. CONCLUSION: Our mechanical proof procedure and our testing methods provide a powerful arsenal of methods to ensure non-ambiguity.
Janina Reeder, Peter Steffen, Robert Giegerich
BMC Bioinform.1