Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Motoei Azuma

dblp:02/3727 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 9 · 6 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Empirical software engineering · 46% Requirements engineering and software design · 34% Software maintenance and evolution · 15%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software design representation
design documentation
0.011985
SPD: A Humanized Documentation Technology · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1985
Software maintenance and evolution › software quality assurance
software quality assessment
0.011985
Software Quality Assessment Technology · ICSE 1985
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
specification methods
0.011993
An Empirical Study of Evaluating Software Development Environment Quality · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1993
Requirements engineering and software design › design process
program design
0.011985
SPD: A Humanized Documentation Technology · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1985
Programming languages and type systems › programming paradigms
structured programming
0.011985
SPD: A Humanized Documentation Technology · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

software quality evaluation process model · 0.0ISO/IEC 9126 quality model · 0.0documentation technology · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Software products evaluation system: quality models, metrics and processes - International Standards and Japanese practice
Motoei Azuma
Inf. Softw. Technol.1
1994 Software management practice and metrics in the European community and Japan: Some results of a survey
Motoei Azuma, David Mole
J. Syst. Softw.1
1993 An Empirical Study of Evaluating Software Development Environment Quality
abstract
A study that evaluates new-paradigm-oriented software development environments which have been developed in the five-year formal approach to software environment technology (FASET) project is reviewed. For this study, a software environment evaluation technology based on a software quality evaluation process model defined in ISO/IEC 9126 has been developed. The evaluation technology has been applied to the R&D project at the middle and final phase of development. The evaluation results provide useful information to develop a widely acceptable evaluation technology and to improve the new-paradigm-oriented software development environments that are based on various specification methods: the algebraic specification method, function-oriented specification method, declarative specification method, natural-language-oriented specification method, diagrammatic specification method, state-transition-oriented specification method, and model-based specification method.>
Takeshige Miyoshi, Motoei Azuma
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2
1992 Dependable Computing and Fault-Tolerant Systems, Vol. 5 - Dependability: Basic Concepts and Terminology, by J. C. Laprie (Editor), Springer-Verlag, 1992 (Book Review)
Motoei Azuma
Softw. Test. Verification Reliab.1
1990 Panel: the model and metrics for software quality evaluation report of the Japanese National Working Group
abstract
The Japanese National Working Group has carried out research on developing a framework which clarifies the relation among internal and external characteristics, factors which affect software quality, and the effect of software quality. An attempt has also been made to develop metrics to measure them. The concept model and metrics that have been developed are presented with the future plan. Specifically, attention is given to the measurement of reliability, portability, functionality, usability, and maintainability.>
Motoei Azuma
COMPSAC1
1989 Evaluating software development environment quality
abstract
An evaluation technology for software development environments based on a software quality evaluation process model was developed. This evaluation technology was applied to a software development environments project, FASET (formal approach to software environment technology), to evaluate prototype environments. The quality evaluation process model and its concept are presented, the technology for evaluating a software development environment is described, and the experimental process and results of the FASET project are shown.>
Takeshige Miyoshi, Yasuko Togashi, Motoei Azuma
COMPSAC3
1985 Software Quality Assessment Technology
T. Sunazuka, Motoei Azuma, Noriko Yamagishi
ICSE2
1985 SPD: A Humanized Documentation Technology
abstract
The SPD (Structured Programming Diagram) is a documentation technology used to design well structured programs. With SPD, designers can easily express functional structure, control structure, and physical layout of a program on one sheet of paper. Its straightforward expression appeals to both document writers and readers. SPD concept and conventions are introduced in this paper. SPD usage is then explained with a program design example. Other documentation technologies used in coordination with SPD are briefly touched upon. Finally, SPD reputation and evolution in the last ten years are reviewed.
Motoei Azuma, Tetsu Tabata, Yoshihiro Oki, Susumu Kamiya
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
1981 Interactive Software Development Tool: ISDT
Motoei Azuma, Susumu Kamiya, K. Minomura
ICSE1