Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark G. Bures

dblp:02/3863 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
cheminformatics
0.012000
Molecular diversity: strategies and concerns (abstract only) · RECOMB 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics
molecular diversity
0.012000
Molecular diversity: strategies and concerns (abstract only) · RECOMB 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics
molecular similarity
0.012000
Molecular diversity: strategies and concerns (abstract only) · RECOMB 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

similarity calculation · 0.0molecular descriptors · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Molecular diversity: strategies and concerns (abstract only)
abstract
Automation has produced the opportunity to test hundreds of thousands of compounds in a biological test. The challenge of the computational chemist is to select, from the 10180 possible drug-like molecules, those that are most attractive for screening, those that could form the basis of a medicinal chemistry program. Early work focused on selecting diverse compounds, leading to the question of how similar compounds must be in order for them to have similar biological activity. The issue, of course, is how to quantitate the similarity—which molecular descriptors and which similarity calculation provide the best result. More recent work has emphasized the consideration of physical properties to eliminate compounds, with the challenge of finding accurate and comprehensive methods to calculate these properties.
Yvonne C. Martin, Mark G. Bures
RECOMB2