Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Louis Hodes

dblp:02/3954 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1972
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Computational complexity · 62% Automated reasoning and model checking · 33% Mathematical optimization · 5%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity
logical complexity
0.021970
The Logical Complexity of Geometric Properties in the Plane · J. ACM 1970
The Logical Complexity of Geometric Properties in the Plane · STOC 1969
Automated reasoning and model checking
automated reasoning
0.011971
Solving Problems by Formula Manipulation in Logic and Linear Inequalities · IJCAI 1971
Computational complexity
boolean function complexity
0.011969
The Logical Complexity of Geometric Properties in the Plane · STOC 1969
Computational complexity
descriptive complexity
0.011970
The Logical Complexity of Geometric Properties in the Plane · J. ACM 1970
Computational complexity › circuit complexity
formula size
0.011969
The Logical Complexity of Geometric Properties in the Plane · STOC 1969
Mathematical optimization
linear inequalities
0.011971
Solving Problems by Formula Manipulation in Logic and Linear Inequalities · IJCAI 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logical complexity · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1972 Solving Problems by Formula Manipulation in Logic and Linear Inequalities
Louis Hodes
Artif. Intell.1
1971 Solving Problems by Formula Manipulation in Logic and Linear Inequalities
Louis Hodes
IJCAI1
1970 The Logical Complexity of Geometric Properties in the Plane
abstract
article Free Access Share on The Logical Complexity of Geometric Properties in the Plane Author: Louis Hodes Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Division of Computer Research and Technology, National Institue of Health, Public Health Service, Bethesda, Maryland Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Division of Computer Research and Technology, National Institue of Health, Public Health Service, Bethesda, MarylandView Profile Authors Info & Claims Journal of the ACMVolume 17Issue 2pp 339–347https://doi.org/10.1145/321574.321587Published:01 April 1970Publication History 12citation271DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations12Total Downloads271Last 12 Months5Last 6 weeks1 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF
Louis Hodes
J. ACM1
1969 The Logical Complexity of Geometric Properties in the Plane
abstract
This paper studies the logical complexity of geometric properties in the plane. These properties are characterized according to the length of formulas necessary to express them. In this study a portion of the plane X will be considered as a collection of squares {x1, ..., xn} arranged into a fine grid. A pattern P is a subset of X and the grid is assumed to be fine enough so that approximations to geometrical figures can be obtained. P can be defined by mapping m: X →{0,1} where for x ε X, m(x) = 1 iff x ε P. A set of patterns or a geometrical property ℘ can be expressed as a Boolean function f on the n variables x1, ..., xn such that the value of f is 1 under the assignment m iff P ε ℘.
Louis Hodes
STOC1