Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephanie Coleman

dblp:02/4230 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 44% Parallel and multicore computing · 44% Performance modeling and evaluation · 13%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization
loop optimization
0.011995
Tile Size Selection Using Cache Organization and Data Layout · PLDI 1995
Memory systems › cache
cache optimization
0.011995
Tile Size Selection Using Cache Organization and Data Layout · PLDI 1995
Parallel and multicore computing › loop transformation
tile size selection
0.011995
Tile Size Selection Using Cache Organization and Data Layout · PLDI 1995
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation
cache simulation
0.011995
Tile Size Selection Using Cache Organization and Data Layout · PLDI 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0cache miss modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Tile Size Selection Using Cache Organization and Data Layout
abstract
When dense matrix computations are too large to fit in cache, previous research proposes tiling to reduce or eliminate capacity misses. This paper presents a new algorithm for choosing problem-size dependent tile sizes based on the cache size and cache line size for a direct-mapped cache. The algorithm eliminates both capacity and self-interference misses and reduces cross-interference misses. We measured simulated miss rates and execution times for our algorithm and two others on a variety of problem sizes and cache organizations. At higher set associativity, our algorithm does not always achieve the best performance. However on direct-mapped caches, our algorithm improves simulated miss rates and measured execution times when compared with previous work.
Stephanie Coleman, Kathryn S. McKinley
PLDI1