EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Markus Leber
dblp:02/4758
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-7601-4690ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
cheminformatics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Automatic assignment of reaction operators to enzymatic reactions · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › enzyme function prediction
enzyme classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Automatic assignment of reaction operators to enzymatic reactions · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
DNA sequence analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | A fractional programming approach to efficient DNA melting temperature calculation · Bioinform. 2005 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › nonlinear optimization
fractional programming |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | A fractional programming approach to efficient DNA melting temperature calculation · Bioinform. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nearest-neighbor model · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.1dinkelbach algorithm · 0.1reaction matrix · 0.1maximal common substructure determination · 0.1dugundji-ugi model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Novel genetic matching methods for handling population stratification in genome-wide association studiesabstractBACKGROUND: A usually confronted problem in association studies is the occurrence of population stratification. In this work, we propose a novel framework to consider population matchings in the contexts of genome-wide and sequencing association studies. We employ pairwise and groupwise optimal case-control matchings and present an agglomerative hierarchical clustering, both based on a genetic similarity score matrix. In order to ensure that the resulting matches obtained from the matching algorithm capture correctly the population structure, we propose and discuss two stratum validation methods. We also invent a decisive extension to the Cochran-Armitage Trend test to explicitly take into account the particular population structure. RESULTS: We assess our framework by simulations of genotype data under the null hypothesis, to affirm that it correctly controls for the type-1 error rate. By a power study we evaluate that structured association testing using our framework displays reasonable power. We compare our result with those obtained from a logistic regression model with principal component covariates. Using the principal components approaches we also find a possible false-positive association to Alzheimer's disease, which is neither supported by our new methods, nor by the results of a most recent large meta analysis or by a mixed model approach. CONCLUSIONS: Matching methods provide an alternative handling of confounding due to population stratification for statistical tests for which covariates are hard to model. As a benchmark, we show that our matching framework performs equally well to state of the art models on common variants. André Lacour, Vitalia Schüller, Dmitriy Drichel, Christine Herold, Frank Jessen, Markus Leber, Wolfgang Maier 0002, Markus M. Nöthen, Alfredo Ramirez, Tatsiana Vaitsiakhovich, Tim Becker |
BMC Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2012 | Quick, "Imputation-free" meta-analysis with proxy-SNPsabstractBACKGROUND: Meta-analysis (MA) is widely used to pool genome-wide association studies (GWASes) in order to a) increase the power to detect strong or weak genotype effects or b) as a result verification method. As a consequence of differing SNP panels among genotyping chips, imputation is the method of choice within GWAS consortia to avoid losing too many SNPs in a MA. YAMAS (Yet Another Meta Analysis Software), however, enables cross-GWAS conclusions prior to finished and polished imputation runs, which eventually are time-consuming. RESULTS: Here we present a fast method to avoid forfeiting SNPs present in only a subset of studies, without relying on imputation. This is accomplished by using reference linkage disequilibrium data from 1,000 Genomes/HapMap projects to find proxy-SNPs together with in-phase alleles for SNPs missing in at least one study. MA is conducted by combining association effect estimates of a SNP and those of its proxy-SNPs. Our algorithm is implemented in the MA software YAMAS. Association results from GWAS analysis applications can be used as input files for MA, tremendously speeding up MA compared to the conventional imputation approach. We show that our proxy algorithm is well-powered and yields valuable ad hoc results, possibly providing an incentive for follow-up studies. We propose our method as a quick screening step prior to imputation-based MA, as well as an additional main approach for studies without available reference data matching the ethnicities of study participants. As a proof of principle, we analyzed six dbGaP Type II Diabetes GWAS and found that the proxy algorithm clearly outperforms naïve MA on the p-value level: for 17 out of 23 we observe an improvement on the p-value level by a factor of more than two, and a maximum improvement by a factor of 2127. CONCLUSIONS: YAMAS is an efficient and fast meta-analysis program which offers various methods, including conventional MA as well as inserting proxy-SNPs for missing markers to avoid unnecessary power loss. MA with YAMAS can be readily conducted as YAMAS provides a generic parser for heterogeneous tabulated file formats within the GWAS field and avoids cumbersome setups. In this way, it supplements the meta-analysis process. Christian Meesters, Markus Leber, Christine Herold, Marina Angisch, Manuel Mattheisen, Dmitriy Drichel, André Lacour, Tim Becker |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2009 | Automatic assignment of reaction operators to enzymatic reactionsabstractBACKGROUND: Enzymes are classified in a numerical classification scheme introduced by the Nomenclature Committee of the IUBMB based on the overall reaction chemistry. Due to the manifold of enzymatic reactions the system has become highly complex. Assignment of enzymes to the enzyme classes requires a detailed knowledge of the system and manual analysis. Frequently rearrangements and deletions of enzymes and sub-subclasses are necessary. RESULTS: We use the Dugundji-Ugi model for coding of biochemical reactions which is based on electron shift patterns occurring during reactions. Changes of the bonds or of non-bonded valence electrons are expressed by reaction matrices. Our program calculates reaction matrices automatically on the sole basis of substrate and product chemical structures based on a new strategy for maximal common substructure determination, which allows an accurate atom mapping of the substrate and product atoms. The system has been tested for a large set of enzymatic reactions including all sub-subclasses of the EC classification system. Altogether 147 different representative reaction operators were found in the classified enzymes, 121 of which are unique with respect to an EC sub-subclass. The other 26 comprise groups of enzymes with very similar reactions, being identical with respect to the bonds formed and broken. CONCLUSION: The analysis and comparison of enzymatic reactions according to their electron shift patterns is defining enzyme groups characterised by unique reaction cores. Our results demonstrate the applicability of the Dugundji-Ugi model as a reasonable pre-classification system allowing an objective and rational view on biochemical reactions. AVAILABILITY: The program to generate reaction matrix descriptors is available upon request. Markus Leber, Volker Egelhofer, Ida Schomburg, Dietmar Schomburg |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2005 | A fractional programming approach to efficient DNA melting temperature calculationabstractMOTIVATION: In a wide range of experimental techniques in biology, there is a need for an efficient method to calculate the melting temperature of pairings of two single DNA strands. Avoiding cross-hybridization when choosing primers for the polymerase chain reaction or selecting probes for large-scale DNA assays are examples where the exact determination of melting temperatures is important. Beyond being exact, the method has to be efficient, as these techniques often require the simultaneous calculation of melting temperatures of up to millions of possible pairings. The problem is to simultaneously determine the most stable alignment of two sequences, including potential loops and bulges, and calculate the corresponding melting temperature. RESULTS: As the melting temperature can be expressed as a fraction in terms of enthalpy and entropy differences of the corresponding annealing reaction, we propose to use a fractional programming algorithm, the Dinkelbach algorithm, to solve the problem. To calculate the required differences of enthalpy and entropy, the Nearest Neighbor model is applied. Using this model, the substeps of the Dinkelbach algorithm in our problem setting turn out to be calculations of alignments which optimize an additive score function. Thus, the usual dynamic programming techniques can be applied. The result is an efficient algorithm to determine melting temperatures of two DNA strands, suitable for large-scale applications such as primer or probe design. AVAILABILITY: The software is available for academic purposes from the authors. A web interface is provided at http://www.zaik.uni-koeln.de/bioinformatik/fptm.html Markus Leber, Lars Kaderali, Alexander Schönhuth, Rainer Schrader |
Bioinform. | 1 |