Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ziad Bizri
dblp:02/4823
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Authentication and access control · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control
access control policy |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | On mutually-exclusive roles and separation of duty · CCS 2004 |
Authentication and access control › access control
role-based access control |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | On mutually-exclusive roles and separation of duty · CCS 2004 |
Authentication and access control › access control policy
separation of duty |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | On mutually-exclusive roles and separation of duty · CCS 2004 |
Computational complexity › complexity classes › coNP
coNP-completeness |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | On mutually-exclusive roles and separation of duty · CCS 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
complexity analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | On mutually exclusive roles and separation-of-dutyabstractSeparation-of-duty (SoD) is widely considered to be a fundamental principle in computer security. A static SoD (SSoD) policy states that in order to have all permissions necessary to complete a sensitive task, the cooperation of at least a certain number of users is required. Role-based access control (RBAC) is today's dominant access-control model. It is widely believed that one of RBAC's main strengths is that it enables the use of constraints to support policies, such as separation-of-duty. In the literature on RBAC, statically mutually exclusive roles (SMER) constraints are used to enforce SSoD policies. In this paper, we formulate and study fundamental computational problems related to the use of SMER constraints to enforce SSoD policies. We show that directly enforcing SSoD policies is intractable (coNP-complete), while checking whether an RBAC state satisfies a set of SMER constraints is efficient; however, verifying whether a given set of SMER constraints enforces an SSoD policy is also intractable (coNP-complete). We discuss the implications of these results. We show also how to generate SMER constraints that are as accurate as possible for enforcing an SSoD policy. Ninghui Li 0001, Mahesh Tripunitara, Ziad Bizri |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. | 3 |
| 2004 | On mutually-exclusive roles and separation of dutyabstractSeparation of Duty (SoD) is widely considered to be a fundamental principle in computer security. A Static SoD (SSoD) policy states that in order to have all permissions necessary to complete a sensitive task, the cooperation of at least a certain number of users is required. In Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Statically Mutually Exclusive Role (SMER) constraints are used to enforce SSoD policies. In this paper, we pose and answer fundamental questions related to the use of SMER constraints to enforce SSoD policies. We show that directly enforcing SSoD policies is intractable (coNP-complete), while checking whether an RBAC state satisfies a set of SMER constraints is efficient. Also, we show that verifying whether a given set of SMER constraints enforces an SSoD policy is intractable (coNP-complete) and discuss why this intractability result should not lead us to conclude that SMER constraints are not an appropriate mechanism for enforcing SSoD policies. Ninghui Li 0001, Ziad Bizri, Mahesh Tripunitara |
CCS | 2 |