Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alan Ptak

dblp:02/5171 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time embedded systems
embedded control systems
0.011998
Schedulability Analysis for Automated Implementations of Real-Time Object-Oriented Models · RTSS 1998
Embedded and real-time systems
model-based design
0.011998
Schedulability Analysis for Automated Implementations of Real-Time Object-Oriented Models · RTSS 1998
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.011998
Schedulability Analysis for Automated Implementations of Real-Time Object-Oriented Models · RTSS 1998
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
schedulability analysis
0.011998
Schedulability Analysis for Automated Implementations of Real-Time Object-Oriented Models · RTSS 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

real-time scheduling theory · 0.0ROOM methodology · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Schedulability Analysis for Automated Implementations of Real-Time Object-Oriented Models
abstract
The increasing complexity of real time software has led to a recent trend in the use of high level modeling languages for development of real time software. One representative example is the modeling language ROOM (real time object oriented modeling), which provides features such as object orientation, state machine description of behaviors, formal semantics for executability of models, and possibility of automated code generation. However these modeling languages largely ignore the timeliness aspect of real time systems, and fail to provide any guidance for a designer to a priori predict and analyze temporal behavior. We consider schedulability analysis for automated implementations of ROOM models, based on the ObjecTime toolset. This work builds on results presented by M. Saksena (1997), where we developed some guidelines for the design and implementation of real time object oriented models. Using the guidelines, we have modified the run time system library provided by the ObjecTime toolset to make it amenable to schedulability analysis. Based on the modified toolset, we show how a ROOM model can be analyzed for schedulability, taking into account the implementation overheads and structure. The analysis is validated experimentally, first using simple periodic models, and then using a large case study of a train tilting system.
Manas Saksena, Alan Ptak, Paul Freedman, Pawel Rodziewicz
RTSS2