Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiangyu Wang 0006

dblp:02/6128-6 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 62% Learning theory · 31% Efficient and distributed learning · 7%
Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Mathematical optimization · 72% Information theory · 22% Algorithms and data structures · 5%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional regression
0.522016
DECOrrelated feature space partitioning for distributed sparse regression · NIPS 2016
No penalty no tears: Least squares in high-dimensional linear models · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.522016
Towards Unifying Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Slice Sampling · NIPS 2016
Parallelizing MCMC with Random Partition Trees · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
hamiltonian monte carlo
0.212016
Towards Unifying Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Slice Sampling · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
slice sampling
0.212016
Towards Unifying Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Slice Sampling · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional regression
sparse regression
0.212016
DECOrrelated feature space partitioning for distributed sparse regression · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization
0.212016
DECOrrelated feature space partitioning for distributed sparse regression · NIPS 2016
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
0.212016
No penalty no tears: Least squares in high-dimensional linear models · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.212015
Parallelizing MCMC with Random Partition Trees · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
parallel MCMC
0.212015
Parallelizing MCMC with Random Partition Trees · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › posterior inference
posterior aggregation
0.212015
Parallelizing MCMC with Random Partition Trees · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parallel inference
0.212014
Median Selection Subset Aggregation for Parallel Inference · NIPS 2014
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › proximal methods
alternating direction method of multipliers
0.112018
A Direct Approach for Sparse Quadratic Discriminant Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.112018
A Direct Approach for Sparse Quadratic Discriminant Analysis · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.112016
No penalty no tears: Least squares in high-dimensional linear models · ICML 2016
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection
0.112016
DECOrrelated feature space partitioning for distributed sparse regression · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization
high-dimensional statistics
0.112015
On the consistency theory of high dimensional variable screening · NIPS 2015
Algorithms and data structures › selection
selection algorithms
0.112014
Median Selection Subset Aggregation for Parallel Inference · NIPS 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ridge regression · 0.5ordinary least squares · 0.5hard thresholding · 0.5distributed computing · 0.5decorrelation · 0.5convex optimization · 0.5regularization · 0.3alternating direction method of multipliers · 0.3monomial gamma sampler · 0.2hamiltonian-jacobi equation · 0.2random partition trees · 0.2linear screening · 0.2HOLP · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 A Direct Approach for Sparse Quadratic Discriminant Analysis
abstract
Quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) is a standard tool for classification due to its simplicity and flexibility. Because the number of its parameters scales quadratically with the number of the variables, QDA is not practical, however, when the dimensionality is relatively large. To address this, we propose a novel procedure named DA-QDA for QDA in analyzing high-dimensional data. Formulated in a simple and coherent framework, DA-QDA aims to directly estimate the key quantities in the Bayes discriminant function including quadratic interactions and a linear index of the variables for classification. Under appropriate sparsity assumptions, we establish consistency results for estimating the interactions and the linear index, and further demonstrate that the misclassification rate of our procedure converges to the optimal Bayes risk, even when the dimensionality is exponentially high with respect to the sample size. An efficient algorithm based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is developed for finding interactions, which is much faster than its competitor in the literature. The promising performance of DA-QDA is illustrated via extensive simulation studies and the analysis of four real datasets.
Binyan Jiang, Xiangyu Wang 0006, Chenlei Leng
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2016 No penalty no tears: Least squares in high-dimensional linear models
abstract
Ordinary least squares (OLS) is the default method for fitting linear models, but is not applicable for problems with dimensionality larger than the sample size. For these problems, we advocate the use of a generalized version of OLS motivated by ridge regression, and propose two novel three-step algorithms involving least squares fitting and hard thresholding. The algorithms are methodologically simple to understand intuitively, computationally easy to implement efficiently, and theoretically appealing for choosing models consistently. Numerical exercises comparing our methods with penalization-based approaches in simulations and data analyses illustrate the great potential of the proposed algorithms.
Xiangyu Wang 0006, David B. Dunson, Chenlei Leng
ICML1
2016 DECOrrelated feature space partitioning for distributed sparse regression
abstract
Fitting statistical models is computationally challenging when the sample size or the dimension of the dataset is huge. An attractive approach for down-scaling the problem size is to first partition the dataset into subsets and then fit using distributed algorithms. The dataset can be partitioned either horizontally (in the sample space) or vertically (in the feature space). While the majority of the literature focuses on sample space partitioning, feature space partitioning is more effective when p >> n. Existing methods for partitioning features, however, are either vulnerable to high correlations or inefficient in reducing the model dimension. In this paper, we solve these problems through a new embarrassingly parallel framework named DECO for distributed variable selection and parameter estimation. In DECO, variables are first partitioned and allocated to m distributed workers. The decorrelated subset data within each worker are then fitted via any algorithm designed for high-dimensional problems. We show that by incorporating the decorrelation step, DECO can achieve consistent variable selection and parameter estimation on each subset with (almost) no assumptions. In addition, the convergence rate is nearly minimax optimal for both sparse and weakly sparse models and does NOT depend on the partition number m. Extensive numerical experiments are provided to illustrate the performance of the new framework.
Xiangyu Wang 0006, David B. Dunson, Chenlei Leng
NIPS1
2016 Towards Unifying Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and Slice Sampling
abstract
We unify slice sampling and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) sampling, demonstrating their connection via the Hamiltonian-Jacobi equation from Hamiltonian mechanics. This insight enables extension of HMC and slice sampling to a broader family of samplers, called Monomial Gamma Samplers (MGS). We provide a theoretical analysis of the mixing performance of such samplers, proving that in the limit of a single parameter, the MGS draws decorrelated samples from the desired target distribution. We further show that as this parameter tends toward this limit, performance gains are achieved at a cost of increasing numerical difficulty and some practical convergence issues. Our theoretical results are validated with synthetic data and real-world applications.
Yizhe Zhang 0002, Xiangyu Wang 0006, Changyou Chen, Ricardo Henao, Kai Fan 0002, Lawrence Carin
NIPS2
2015 Parallelizing MCMC with Random Partition Trees
abstract
The modern scale of data has brought new challenges to Bayesian inference. In particular, conventional MCMC algorithms are computationally very expensive for large data sets. A promising approach to solve this problem is embarrassingly parallel MCMC (EP-MCMC), which first partitions the data into multiple subsets and runs independent sampling algorithms on each subset. The subset posterior draws are then aggregated via some combining rules to obtain the final approximation. Existing EP-MCMC algorithms are limited by approximation accuracy and difficulty in resampling. In this article, we propose a new EP-MCMC algorithm PART that solves these problems. The new algorithm applies random partition trees to combine the subset posterior draws, which is distribution-free, easy to resample from and can adapt to multiple scales. We provide theoretical justification and extensive experiments illustrating empirical performance.
Xiangyu Wang 0006, Fangjian Guo, Katherine A. Heller, David B. Dunson
NIPS1
2015 On the consistency theory of high dimensional variable screening
abstract
Variable screening is a fast dimension reduction technique for assisting high dimensional feature selection. As a preselection method, it selects a moderate size subset of candidate variables for further refining via feature selection to produce the final model. The performance of variable screening depends on both computational efficiency and the ability to dramatically reduce the number of variables without discarding the important ones. When the data dimension $p$ is substantially larger than the sample size $n$, variable screening becomes crucial as 1) Faster feature selection algorithms are needed; 2) Conditions guaranteeing selection consistency might fail to hold.This article studies a class of linear screening methods and establishes consistency theory for this special class. In particular, we prove the restricted diagonally dominant (RDD) condition is a necessary and sufficient condition for strong screening consistency. As concrete examples, we show two screening methods $SIS$ and $HOLP$ are both strong screening consistent (subject to additional constraints) with large probability if $n > O((\rho s + \sigma/\tau)^2\log p)$ under random designs. In addition, we relate the RDD condition to the irrepresentable condition, and highlight limitations of $SIS$.
Xiangyu Wang 0006, Chenlei Leng, David B. Dunson
NIPS1
2014 Median Selection Subset Aggregation for Parallel Inference
Xiangyu Wang 0006, Peichao Peng, David B. Dunson
NIPS1