EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nadège Pontisso
dblp:02/6240
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 75% Program verification · 25% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
formal methods tools |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | TOPCASED Combining Formal Methods with Model-Driven Engineering · ASE 2006 |
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | TOPCASED Combining Formal Methods with Model-Driven Engineering · ASE 2006 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | TOPCASED Combining Formal Methods with Model-Driven Engineering · ASE 2006 |
Requirements engineering and software design › computer-aided software engineering
tool integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | TOPCASED Combining Formal Methods with Model-Driven Engineering · ASE 2006 |
Embedded and real-time systems
critical systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | TOPCASED Combining Formal Methods with Model-Driven Engineering · ASE 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
eclipse platform · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Analysis of distributed multiperiodic systems to achieve consistent data matchingabstractSUMMARY The distributed real‐time architecture of an embedded system is often described as a set of communicating components. Such a system is dataflow (for its description) and time triggered (for its execution). The architecture forms a graph of communicating components, where more than one path can link two components. Because the characteristics of the network and the behavior of intermediate components may vary or are only partially known, these paths often have different timing characteristics, and the flows of information that transit on these paths reach their destination at independent times. However, an application that seeks consistent values will require these flows to be temporally matched so that a component uses inputs that all (directly or indirectly) depend on the same computation step of another component. In this paper, we define this temporal data‐matching property, both in a strict sense and in a relaxed way allowing approximately consistent values. Then, we show how to analyze a system architecture to detect situations that result in data‐matching inconsistencies. In the context of multiperiodic systems, where components do not necessarily share a common period, we also describe an approach to manage data matching that uses queues to delay too fast paths and timestamps to recognize consistent data sets. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Nadège Pontisso, Philippe Quéinnec, Gérard Padiou |
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. | 1 |
| 2006 | TOPCASED Combining Formal Methods with Model-Driven EngineeringabstractThis paper briefly presents the TOPCASED project which gathers industrialists, researchers, universities and SMEs, aiming at producing a free/open-source system/software/hardware-engineering toolkit, implemented over the Eclipse platform, using only standard components. An important aspect of TOPCASED is that it enables researchers to plug in their tools easily. TOPCASED is meant to be used on actual industrial projects and may therefore be considered as an important target by researchers working on formal methods and foundations of software engineering for critical systems Nadège Pontisso, David Chemouil |
ASE | 1 |