Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard Levinson
dblp:02/6577
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-1102-169XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 93% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 7% Autonomous driving · 0% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Analyzing Launch Operations Using the Spaceport Throughput Analysis Resource (STAR) · ICAPS 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint optimization
mixed-integer linear programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Planning to Coordinate Science Data Collection and Downlink for a Constellation of Agile Satellites with Limited Storage · IJCAI 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › plan optimization
optimal planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Planning to Coordinate Science Data Collection and Downlink for a Constellation of Agile Satellites with Limited Storage · IJCAI 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
scheduling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Analyzing Launch Operations Using the Spaceport Throughput Analysis Resource (STAR) · ICAPS 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
temporal constraints |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Optimal Planning to Coordinate Science Data Collection and Downlink for a Constellation of Agile Satellites with Limited Storage · IJCAI 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
planning and control |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A General Programming Language for Unified Planning and Control · Artif. Intell. 1995 |
Programming languages and type systems
language design |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A General Programming Language for Unified Planning and Control · Artif. Intell. 1995 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Reaction-First Search · IJCAI 1993 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.9rescheduling · 0.9mixed-integer linear programming · 0.9constraint programming · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Time-Dependent Orienteering for High Altitude UAVs to Monitor Greenhouse Gases: - Mixed Integer Programming vs. Monte Carlo Tree Search
Richard Levinson, Vinay Ravindra, Jeremy Frank, Meghan Chandarana Saephan |
CPAIOR (2) | 1 |
| 2025 | Analyzing Launch Operations Using the Spaceport Throughput Analysis Resource (STAR)abstractWe describe the development of the Spaceport Throughput Analysis Resource (STAR), which evaluates Kennedy Space Center spaceport launch throughput. STAR integrates simulation and limited rescheduling, using a constraint programming model to check constraints and reschedule events. The outputs of STAR are launch delays, and the constraint violations leading to those delays, that can be used to inform infrastructure investments to reduce future delays. At STAR's core is a constraint program representing a limited horizon scheduling problem used to identify resource constraint violations, and revise schedules in the presence of unexpected events that disrupt the launch schedule. We describe the design and implementation of STAR using illustrative examples, and describe performance results on use cases showing how increased launch rates stress KSC infrastructure. Richard Levinson, Vijayakumar Baskaran, Jeffrey Brink, Jeremy Frank |
ICAPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Optimal Planning to Coordinate Science Data Collection and Downlink for a Constellation of Agile Satellites with Limited StorageabstractWe present a novel Mixed Integer Linear Program formulation that produces optimal plans for a constellation of remote sensing satellites. The generalized formulation is applied to an operational NASA constellation to improve wildfire danger prediction. The planner generates integrated data collection and downlink plans for multiple agile satellites with limited storage capacity, minimum energy requirements, and temporal constraints. Observation targets and modes are associated with science rewards. The planner maximizes the aggregate rewards collected for all observations on all satellites. Our generalized model for integrated data collection and downlink uses a novel interval-based abstraction called Data Cycles, without time-indexed variables. Data cycles organize the multitude of observation and downlink opportunities from 1 second granularity into sequences of data collection and downlink intervals. Experiments using large-scale real-world data yield optimal 24-hr plans for an eight satellite constellation, which capture 99% of the ~23,000 available targets and 99.9% of available science rewards. Richard Levinson, Vinay Ravindra, Sreeja Roy-Singh |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Distributed Spacecraft with Heuristic Intelligence to Monitor Wildfire Spread for Responsive ControlabstractWe develop and verify a space-based, distributed, adaptive intelligent, responsive New Observing System (NOS) to improve wildfire response decisions by monitoring and forecasting fuel flammability and wildfire spread and providing on-demand fire danger and burnt area maps. We use Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) as the NOS, informed by improvements to existing frameworks - D-SHIELD (Distributed Spacecraft with Heuristic Intelligence to Enable Logistical Decisions) and WRFx (Weather Research and Forecasting Fire Spread Model). Five new products are developed/enhanced using GNSS-R data from CYGNSS (7-sat NASA mission) and Spire Global (commercial fleet) and assimilated into WRFx, which improves existing USGS fire danger and LANDFIRE fuel layers products. These products are expected to inform observation planning and fire management via an observation value framework and a fire forecast reporter that we develop. Adaptive intelligence to dynamically task the observing (satellites) and planning (ground stations) assets, and synchronization between them, is achieved using novel Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) based planner. Sreeja Nag, Vinay Ravindra, Richard Levinson, Mahta Moghaddam, Kurtis Nelson, Jan Mandel, Adam K. Kochanski, Angel Farguell Caus, Amer Melebari, Archana Kannan, Ryan Ketzner |
IGARSS | 3 |
| 2024 | Science Target Prioritization Framework for Remote SensingabstractBehind the scenes of a remote sensing mission there are complex decision making and planning operations. Streamlining these operations, with a quantitative scientific value framework, aids efficient and optimized science data collection. While there have been previous efforts to quantify the science value for specific science scenarios, our work aims to develop a general framework which can be applied across different scenarios. We describe a pipeline of processes which combines model forecast and observation data, in computational forms, as dictated by the mission objectives set forth by subject matter experts. The framework is described with use cases involving the monitoring of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations over the Gulf of Mexico and methane concentrations over interior Alaska. Vinay Ravindra, Douglas Caldwell, Meghan Chandarana Saephan, Bryan Duncan, Sarah Strode, William Swartz, Kristen Manies, Jeremy Frank, Richard Levinson, Eugene Turkov |
IGARSS | 9 |
| 2022 | Forecasting Soil Moisture Using a Deep Learning Model Integrated with Passive Microwave RetrievalabstractIn this paper we develop a Convolutional Long Short-term memory (ConvLSTM) model, a time series deep learning neural network, to predict soil moisture, with an add-on module of passive microwave (radiometer) soil moisture retrieval using the Tau omega model. We incorporate antecedent observations, landscape properties, and forcing factors such as precipitation, landcover, clay fraction, and brightness temperature in the prediction scheme. A regularization Monte Carlo Dropout layer is added to the network to remove stochasticity and avoid overfitting during the training phase. This dropout layer also provides a Bayesian approximation to quantify uncertainty during forecasting. The model is validated at four Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Cal/Val locations using performance metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Bias to evaluate effectiveness of the proposed method. This model is developed as a component of the Science Simulator within the Distributed Spacecraft with Heuristic Intelligence to Enable Logistical Decisions (D-SHIELD) project. Archana Kannan, Grigorios Tsagkatakis, Ruzbeh Akbar, Daniel Selva, Vinay Ravindra, Richard Levinson, Sreeja Nag, Mahta Moghaddam |
IGARSS | 6 |
| 2021 | Soil Moisture Monitoring Using Autonomous and Distributed Spacecraft (D-Shield)abstractWe describe a suite of scalable software methods and frameworks to helps schedule payload operations of a large constellation, with multiple payloads per and across spacecraft, such that the collection of observational data and their downlink, constrained by the constellation constraints (orbital mechanics), resources (e.g., power) and subsystems (e.g., attitude control), results in maximum science value for a selected use case. Constellation topology, spacecraft and ground network characteristics can be imported from design tools or existing constellations and can serve as elements of an operations design tool. Our framework includes a science simulator to inform the scheduler of the predictive value of observations or operational decisions. Autonomous, realtime re-scheduling based on past observations needs improved data assimilation methods within the simulator. Sreeja Nag, Mahta Moghaddam, Daniel Selva, Jeremy Frank, Vinay Ravindra, Richard Levinson, Amir Azemati, Ben Gorr 0001, Alan Li, Ruzbeh Akbar |
IGARSS | 6 |
| 2020 | D-SHIELD: DISTRIBUTED SPACECRAFT WITH HEURISTIC INTELLIGENCE TO ENABLE LOGISTICAL DECISIONSabstractD-SHIELD is a suite of scalable software tools that helps schedule payload operations of a large constellation, with multiple payloads per and across spacecraft, such that the collection of observational data and their downlink, constrained by the constellation constraints (orbital mechanics), resources (e.g., power) and subsystems (e.g., attitude control), results in maximum science value for a selected use case. Constellation topology, spacecraft and ground network characteristics can be imported from design tools or existing constellations and can serve as elements of an operations design tool. D-SHIELD will include a science simulator to inform the scheduler of the predictive value of observations or operational decisions. Autonomous, realtime re-scheduling based on past observations needs improved data assimilation methods within the simulator. Sreeja Nag, Mahta Moghaddam, Daniel Selva, Jeremy Frank, Vinay Ravindra, Richard Levinson, Amir Azemati, Alan Aguilar, Alan Li, Ruzbeh Akbar |
IGARSS | 6 |
| 1995 | A General Programming Language for Unified Planning and Control
Richard Levinson |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 1993 | Reaction-First Search
Mark Drummond, Keith Swanson, John L. Bresina, Richard Levinson |
IJCAI | 4 |