Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jing Wang 0084

dblp:02/736-84 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 87% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
open source software
0.212015
Revisiting Linus's law: Benefits and challenges of open source software peer review · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2015
Empirical software engineering
peer review
0.212015
Revisiting Linus's law: Benefits and challenges of open source software peer review · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2015
Software maintenance and evolution › software ecosystems
open source software ecosystem
0.112015
Revisiting Linus's law: Benefits and challenges of open source software peer review · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2015
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Life After Weight Loss: Design Implications for Community-based Long-term Weight Management
Jing Wang 0084, Patrick C. Shih, John M. Carroll 0001
Comput. Support. Cooperative Work.1
2015 Revisiting Linus's law: Benefits and challenges of open source software peer review
Jing Wang 0084, Patrick C. Shih, John M. Carroll 0001
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2015 Comparative case studies of open source software peer review practices
Jing Wang 0084, Patrick C. Shih, Yu Wu 0017, John M. Carroll 0001
Inf. Softw. Technol.1
2011 Beyond fixing bugs: case studies of creative collaboration in open source software bug fixing processes
abstract
Bug fixing is an important collaborative practice of open source software development. Creative collaborative bug fixing---collectively generating new and useful solutions to improve software quality---is important especially when bugs are difficult to fix. We find bug fixing practices are unavoidably creative by studying Mozilla and Python. We characterize their bug fixing process as four common subprocesses, problem identification, preparation, solution generation, and solution evaluation. We discuss the key challenges of creative collaboration during each subprocess, and recommend design implications to enhance creative collaborative bug fixing processes, including support for establishment of common ground, externalization of social networks, awareness of resolving progress, and articulation of design rationale.
Jing Wang 0084, John M. Carroll 0001
Creativity & Cognition1