Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ryan Magargle

dblp:02/80 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › microfluidic biochip design
microfluidic system design
0.112006
Microfluidic Injector Models Based on Artificial Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

finite element simulation · 0.1artificial neural network · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Microfluidic Injector Models Based on Artificial Neural Networks
abstract
Lab-on-a-chip (LoC) systems can be functionally decomposed into their basic operating devices. Common devices are mixers, reactors, injectors, and separators. In this paper, the injector device is modeled using artificial neural networks (NNs) trained with finite element simulations of the underlying mass transport partial differential equations (PDEs). This technique is used to map the injector behavior into a set of analytical performance functions parameterized by the system's physical variables. The injector examples shown are the cross, the double-tee, and the gated-cross. The results are four orders of magnitude faster than numerical simulation and accurate with mean square errors (MSEs) on the order of$10^-4$. The resulting NN training data compare favorably with experimental data from a gated-cross injector found in the literature.
Ryan Magargle, James F. Hoburg, Tamal Mukherjee
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1