Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Li Guo 0008

dblp:02/929-8 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 55% Recommender systems · 36% Information retrieval · 8%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational finance and economics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering
0.212016
Minimizing Legal Exposure of High-Tech Companies through Collaborative Filtering Methods · KDD 2016
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling
0.212014
Technology Prospecting for High Tech Companies through Patent Mining · ICDM 2014
Information retrieval › text matching
document matching
0.112014
Technology Prospecting for High Tech Companies through Patent Mining · ICDM 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-aware prediction · 0.5slope one predictor · 0.5topic model · 0.2matching · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Minimizing Legal Exposure of High-Tech Companies through Collaborative Filtering Methods
abstract
Patent litigation not only covers legal and technical issues, it is also a key consideration for managers of high-technology (high-tech) companies when making strategic decisions. Patent litigation influences the market value of high-tech companies. However, this raises unique challenges. To this end, in this paper, we develop a novel recommendation framework to solve the problem of litigation risk prediction. We will introduce a specific type of patent-related litigation, that is, Section 337 investigations, which prohibit all acts of unfair competition, or any unfair trade practices, when exporting products to the United States. To build this recommendation framework, we collect and exploit a large amount of published information related to almost all Section 337 investigation cases. This study has two aims: (1) to predict the litigation risk in a specific industry category for high-tech companies and (2) to predict the litigation risk from competitors for high-tech companies. These aims can be achieved by mining historical investigation cases and related patents. Specifically, we propose two methods to meet the needs of both aims: a proximal slope one predictor and a time-aware predictor. Several factors are considered in the proposed methods, including the litigation risk if a company wants to enter a new market and the risk that a potential competitor would file a lawsuit against the new entrant. Comparative experiments using real-world data demonstrate that the proposed methods outperform several baselines with a significant margin.
Bo Jin 0001, Chao Che, Kuifei Yu, Li Guo 0008, Cuili Yao, Ruiyun Yu, Qiang Zhang 0008
KDD5
2016 Strong Convergence Analysis of Batch Gradient-Based Learning Algorithm for Training Pi-Sigma Network Based on TSK Fuzzy Models
Yan Liu 0015, Dakun Yang, Nan Nan, Li Guo 0008
Neural Process. Lett.4
2014 Technology Prospecting for High Tech Companies through Patent Mining
abstract
Technology prospecting is a process to evaluate the potential business values of high tech companies from the technology perspective. In this paper, we provide a new view-angle to understand technology prospecting by studying the evolving distributions of technologies in the companies. Specifically, we first exploit topic models to learn technological context in the form of probabilistic distributions of assignees and locations from large-scale patent documents. Then, we develop a matching solution to measure the relationships between patent topics and the description documents of technology terms. In this way, we can obtain the distribution of technologies for each company. In addition, we are able to assess the technology prospecting of a company by a designed indicator, which allows to compare the levels of discrepancies between the emerging technology distributions available as Garner Hype Cycles and the distribution of technologies of the company. Finally, experimental results on real-world patent data show the effectiveness of our approach for technology prospecting.
Bo Jin 0001, Yong Ge 0001, Hengshu Zhu, Li Guo 0008, Hui Xiong 0001
ICDM4